Élaboration et évaluation de produits géotouristiques

Martin, Simon; Regolini-Bissig, Géraldine; Perret, Amandine; Kozlik, Lenka

doi:10.7202/1024871ar

Cited by 24 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It can concern one individual geomorphosite or several networking sites. The educational and geotourist products should follow specific guidelines, such as, for example, the ones proposed by Martin et al (2010). The second one is the management itself that should have sufficient financial, personal and jurisdictional means.…”

Section: The Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Approach for the Inventory and Management of Geomorphological Heritage at the Regional Scale

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to the renewed interest for sites of geological interest, both in nature conservation and tourist sectors, numerous regional and national geosite inventories have been carried out in several countries during the last two decades. Several research groups discussed methodological issues, in particular concerning the assessment, and proposed various assessment methods. The University of Lausanne developed a method for assessing the scientific and additional values of geomorphosites in 2007. The method was widely used in regional inventories in Switzerland and abroad. This paper presents a new version of the method and discusses four main issues: (1) the assessment methodology is included in a larger process, from the selection of potential geomorphosites to their use and evaluation by stakeholders; (2) a particular attention is put on the selection of potential geomorphosites that will then be assessed and a simple approach crossing a spatial selection (the selected geomorphosites should be representative of the regional geomorphological processes) and a temporal one (the selected geomorphosites should cover the whole temporal stages of the regional morphogenesis, with both relict and active landforms) is proposed; (3) a new part is added in the assessment method; it concerns the use characteristics and fills a gap in the existing method; (4) finally, the paper discusses mapping and representation issues: specific maps are produced at two levels: simple geomorphological maps accompany the assessment of each geomorphosite and synthetic maps, covering the whole study area, are produced for the communication of results to stakeholders. For this, four types of representation (qualitative, univariate, bivariate, multivariate) are proposed. The method is illustrated by three examples of inventories carried out in Western Switzerland and Haute-Savoie (France).

show abstract

Section: The Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Approach for the Inventory and Management of Geomorphological Heritage at the Regional Scale

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, new technologies offer lots of tools for geotourist enhancement of invisible geomorphosites (e.g., geointerpretation tools (Martin et al 2010, Cayla 2014, 3D reconstructions (Cayla et al 2012) or interpretive images ). This encouraged to include deleted landforms, such as Monte della Giustizia, in the geomorphosite inventory.…”

Section: Geomorphoheritage Characterizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The geohistorical analysis highlights the significance of invisible landforms. Their value can be assessed (Clivaz, Reynard 2017) and communicated as a geotourism product (Martin et al 2010, Cayla 2014, using geointerpretation tools (Hose 2012, Martin 2014 to solve the problem of enhancing something invisible.…”

Section: Visibility (V)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some pioneering works are from london (Robinson 1982(Robinson , 1984(Robinson , 1985; more recent studies analyse the origin of building stones (Gomez-Heras et al 2010, Perez-Monserrat et al 2013, Borghi et al 2015, Del lama et al 2015 and the geological/geomorphological features of the natural site on which a city is built (Côté et al 2009, Rodrigues et al 2011, Del Monte et al 2013; the links between geoheritage and archaeological heritage (Dóniz-Páez, Becerra-Ramíre, 2015, Palacio Prieto 2015; geotourism mapping (Côté et al 2009. Urban areas also provide interesting contextual conditions for developing geotouristic products (Reynard et al 2015, based on geo-interpretation (Martin et al 2010, Hose 2012, Martin 2014.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Contribution for an Urban Geomorphoheritage Assessment Method: Proposal from Three Geomorphosites in Rome (Italy)

Pica

Luberti

Vergari

et al. 2017

Quaestiones Geographicae

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PicA A., luberti G.M., VerGAri F., Fredi P., del Monte M., 2017. Contribution for an urban geomorphoheritage assessment method: proposal from three geomorphosites in Rome (Italy). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 21-36. 7 figs, 1 table.AbstrAct: Urban geomorphology has important implications in spatial planning of human activities, and it also has a geotouristic potential due to the relationship between cultural and geomorphological heritage. Despite the introduction of the term Anthropocene to describe the deep influence that human activities have had in recent times on Earth evolution, urban geomorphological heritage studies are relatively rare and limited and urban geotourism development is recent. The analysis of the complex urban landscape often need the integration of multidisciplinary data. This study aims to propose the first urban geomorphoheritage assessment method, which originates after long-lasting previous geomorphological and geotouristic studies on Rome city centre, it depict rare examples of the geomorphological mapping of a metropolis and, at the same time, of an inventory of urban geomorphosites. The proposal is applied to geomorphosites in the Esquilino neighbourhood of Rome, whose analysis confirm the need for an ad hoc method for assessing urban geomorphosites, as already highlighted in the most recent literature on the topic. The urban geomorphoheritage assessment method is based on: (i) the urban geomorphological analysis by means of multitemporal and multidisciplinary data; (ii) the geomorphosite inventory; and (iii) the geomorphoheritage assessment and enhancement. One challenge is to assess invisible geomorphosites that are widespread in urban context. To this aim, we reworked the attributes describing the Value of a site for Geotourism in order to build up a specific methodology for the analysis of the urban geomorphological heritage.

show abstract

“…to share scientific knowledge with institutions and / or the wider public, unfortunately remains unachieved. Thus, we may wonder if geotourism and geoconservation approaches are more Martin et al (2010), the development of each geotourist product should be based on a complete evaluation of the public (more broadly of all tourist actors), site, contents and support characteristics. In a second step, specific choices (objectives, targets, means, etc.)…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geomorphological heritage, conservation and promotion in high-alpine protected areas

Bosson¹,

Reynard²

2012

ecomont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent decades, recognition of both cultural and natural heritage has grown in the Alps. This tendency illustrates a collective identity building (local, national, alpine), but it also highlights, in the current context of global change, a renewed reflection of man's relationship with the environment. Thus, a fundamental and scientific intrinsic value (as a part of wilderness) tends to be recognized in the natural heritage as a whole. However, geoheritage (and geodiversity) is still often perceived as a secondary natural component, compared with bioheritage (and biodiversity). In this context, we study the geomorphological heritage (landforms and the processes that shape them) of Les Contamines-Montjoie Natural Reserve. Indeed, despite the high geomorphological richness (especially glacial) of the reserve, which covers more than 4000 ha of the Mont-Blanc Massif, local recognition of this heritage is still limited. In order to recognize and protect it, and starting with a scientific study, this research identifies the main local richness and assesses the geotourist and educational potentials. Finally, several tools to educate and promote geoheritage (educational paths and website) are proposed. 13R e search eco.m o n t -Vo l u m e 4 , N u m b e r 1 , J u n e 2 0 1 2 ISSN 2 0 7 3 -1 0 6 X p r i n t v e r s i o n ISSN 2 0 7 3 -1 5 5 8 o n l i n e v e r s i o n : h t t p : / / e p u b . o e a w. a c . a t / e c o . m o n t

show abstract

Élaboration et évaluation de produits géotouristiques

Cited by 24 publications

References 18 publications

Integrated Approach for the Inventory and Management of Geomorphological Heritage at the Regional Scale

Integrated Approach for the Inventory and Management of Geomorphological Heritage at the Regional Scale

Contribution for an Urban Geomorphoheritage Assessment Method: Proposal from Three Geomorphosites in Rome (Italy)

Geomorphological heritage, conservation and promotion in high-alpine protected areas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About