Contribution for an Urban Geomorphoheritage Assessment Method: Proposal from Three Geomorphosites in Rome (Italy)

Abstract

PicA A., luberti G.M., VerGAri F., Fredi P., del Monte M., 2017. Contribution for an urban geomorphoheritage assessment method: proposal from three geomorphosites in Rome (Italy). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 21-36. 7 figs, 1 table.AbstrAct: Urban geomorphology has important implications in spatial planning of human activities, and it also has a geotouristic potential due to the relationship between cultural and geomorphological heritage. Despite the introduction of the term Anthropocene to describe the deep influence that human activities have had in recent times on Earth evolution, urban geomorphological heritage studies are relatively rare and limited and urban geotourism development is recent. The analysis of the complex urban landscape often need the integration of multidisciplinary data. This study aims to propose the first urban geomorphoheritage assessment method, which originates after long-lasting previous geomorphological and geotouristic studies on Rome city centre, it depict rare examples of the geomorphological mapping of a metropolis and, at the same time, of an inventory of urban geomorphosites. The proposal is applied to geomorphosites in the Esquilino neighbourhood of Rome, whose analysis confirm the need for an ad hoc method for assessing urban geomorphosites, as already highlighted in the most recent literature on the topic. The urban geomorphoheritage assessment method is based on: (i) the urban geomorphological analysis by means of multitemporal and multidisciplinary data; (ii) the geomorphosite inventory; and (iii) the geomorphoheritage assessment and enhancement. One challenge is to assess invisible geomorphosites that are widespread in urban context. To this aim, we reworked the attributes describing the Value of a site for Geotourism in order to build up a specific methodology for the analysis of the urban geomorphological heritage.

Existing and Proposed Urban Geosites Values Resulting from Geodiversity of Poznań City

“…Pica et al (2017) in their article do not make any suggestion to the number of points assigned to each of the characteristics in question. Consequently, the same scores were used as in the article of Pica et al (2014), ie on a scale of 1-5.…”

“…Alexandrowicz (1989), Cendrero (2005, 2009) Rybár (2010), Baca and Schuster (2011), Bruschi et al (2011), Fassoulas et al (2012), kubaliková (2013), Reynard, Coratza (2013, Pica et al (2014Pica et al ( , 2016Pica et al ( , 2017, Rocha et al (2014), Brilha (2016), kubaliková and kirchner (2016. These methods have been reviewed by kubaliková (2013), Štrba et al (2014) and partly Migoń and Pijet-Migoń (2017).…”

“…Considering the objectives of this article, the methods developed by Pica et al (2014Pica et al ( , 2017 need thinking, because they concern urban geosites. To test the objectivity of the methods used, the results of their evaluations were compared with one of the existing geosite assessment methods analysed by these authors.…”

“…For urban areas, methodological suggestions by Pica et al (2014Pica et al ( , 2017 seem to exhaust a set of issues for such places. The article by Pica et al (2014) discusses an interesting approach to geomorphological geosites in the urban context.…”

“…The second method by Pica et al (2017) refers to urban geomorphic heritage assessment method, which considers the following criteria:…”