2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration and mechanical characterization of nanocomposites thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
25
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Mechanical properties of poly(methylmethacrylate)-SiO 2 thin films have been studied using nanoindentation technique. 32 An improvement in modulus and hardness has been observed with the increase of the indentation depth, in good agreement with the composition of the layers. Last, we have shown a significant improvement into modulus and hardness with the increase of clay loading because of the addition of stiff clay nanofillers into the poly(3-hydroxybutyrateco-3-hydroxyvalerate) matrix.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…31 Mechanical properties of poly(methylmethacrylate)-SiO 2 thin films have been studied using nanoindentation technique. 32 An improvement in modulus and hardness has been observed with the increase of the indentation depth, in good agreement with the composition of the layers. Last, we have shown a significant improvement into modulus and hardness with the increase of clay loading because of the addition of stiff clay nanofillers into the poly(3-hydroxybutyrateco-3-hydroxyvalerate) matrix.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The substrate indentation hardness and modulus were determined separately by carrying out experiments on an uncoated substrate and values of H = 8.1 ± 0.4 GPa and E = 79.6 ± 2 GPa were found. These values are in good agreement with the reported data from the literature (Mammeri et al, 2006). As can be seen, the hardness and modulus values of the substrates are much higher than those of the CdTe films and therefore may influence the thin film mechanical properties.…”
Section: Fig 3 -The Pictures Of the Scratches Of Cdte Thin Film On Asupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As can be seen, the hardness and modulus values of the substrates are much higher than those of the CdTe films and therefore may influence the thin film mechanical properties. Previous studies (Saha and Nix, 2002;Simunkova et al, 2003;Mammeri et al, 2006) also indicated that the substrate significantly affects the coating hardness and elastic modulus after a critical depth. This effect may be more important in the case of hard films grown on harder substrates (Saha and Nix, 2002; Simunkova et al, 2003).…”
Section: Fig 3 -The Pictures Of the Scratches Of Cdte Thin Film On Amentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[29][30][31][32][33] Furthermore, nanoscratch experiments can provide insight into the attachment strength of the lm to the substrate, by determining the applied force needed for delamination. 32 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%