2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40865-015-0003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaborating on the Effects of Early Offending: a Study of Factors that Mediate the Impact of Onset Age on Long-Term Trajectories of Criminal Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, violent-plus youth, or the criminally versatile, appear to be the most high-risk offender type among the three groups. In addition, the observation of lowest age at first charge among versatile violent youth suggests that they would be at risk of persistent future offending ( Gann, Sullivan, & Ilchi, 2015 ), though it is noted that the age differences between them and the other two groups were very small. Findings imply that rehabilitation for versatile violent youth needs to be administered at a high intensity and also incorporate program that break the cycle of continuous offending.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, violent-plus youth, or the criminally versatile, appear to be the most high-risk offender type among the three groups. In addition, the observation of lowest age at first charge among versatile violent youth suggests that they would be at risk of persistent future offending ( Gann, Sullivan, & Ilchi, 2015 ), though it is noted that the age differences between them and the other two groups were very small. Findings imply that rehabilitation for versatile violent youth needs to be administered at a high intensity and also incorporate program that break the cycle of continuous offending.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included sex (female ¼ 0, male ¼ 1, 3 percent female, 97 percent male), race (white ¼ 0, black ¼ 1, 81 percent white, 19 percent African American), age of arrest onset (mean ¼ 25.7, SD ¼ 13.76, range ¼ 7-78), and total arrest charges (mean ¼ 13.16, SD ¼ 13.83, range ¼ 1-84). Arrest onset is a robust predictor of offending severity with offenders arrested earlier in life at greater liability for deviance than those arrested later in life (DeLisi and Piquero, 2011;Gann et al, 2015;Patterson et al, 1998). Age of arrest onset is a proxy of criminal propensity and the higher that propensity, generally the earlier misconduct will emerge.…”
Section: Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In longitudinal studies, the number of identified trajectories usually ranges between two and five, and these trajectories differ according to the method chosen as well as to the population targeted (Blokland et al, 2005; Boers and Reinecke, 2007; Bushway et al, 2003; Dahle, 2005; Evans et al, 2016; Farrington et al, 2006; Loeber et al,1993; Moffitt, 1993; Moffitt et al, 1996; Murphy et al, 2012; Nagin and Land, 1993; Piquero, 2008; Prein and Schumann, 2003; Sampson and Laub, 2003; Stelly and Thomas, 2005; Thornberry, 2005; Walters, 2012). Typically, there is a large share of approximately 50 percent of non-delinquently involved (or at least hardly involved) individuals in these studies, which often focus on birth cohorts or the general population (see more recent publications, for example Boers et al, 2010; Gann et al, 2015; Murphy et al, 2012; Odgers et al, 2008, Piquero et al, 2010). If only studies using latent group-based trajectory models that identify unobserved heterogeneity in longitudinal datasets are taken into account, as was done in a systematic review by Jennings and Reingle (2012), a range of two to seven groups can be identified.…”
Section: Trajectories Of Delinquency: Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Distinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative stability of deviance and delinquency from childhood to adulthood has been described in the above-mentioned concept of state dependence (Farrington, 1989, 1992; Tracy and Kempf-Leonard, 1996) or cumulative disadvantages (Sampson and Laub, 1993). In various works, involvement in delinquency has been shown to increase the probability of future offending because individual and social circumstances and chances are negatively impacted by the preceding behaviour (Farrington, 2015; Gann et al, 2015; Loeffler, 2013; Nagin and Paternoster, 1991; 2000; Nieuwbeerta et al, 2004). Hence, many recent studies have continued to find childhood risk factors and an early onset of offending to be the best predictors of persistent offending (Baglivio et al, 2015; Bosick et al, 2015; Day et al, 2014).…”
Section: Causes Of Stability and Changementioning
confidence: 99%