2020
DOI: 10.1590/0100-5405/211476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboração e validação de escala diagramática para avaliação da pústula bacteriana em soja

Abstract: RESUMO A pústula bacteriana, causada pela bactéria Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines, é considerada uma das mais sérias doenças bacterianas na cultura da soja. O objetivo deste trabalho foi desenvolver e validar uma escala diagramática para a avaliação da severidade da pústula bacteriana em soja. Para a elaboração da escala, foram coletados folíolos de soja com diferentes níveis de severidade, determinando assim os valores máximos e mínimos de quantidade de doença, e os níveis intermediários de sever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Mafia, Ferreira, Binoti and Leite (2011), R 2 values of up to 0.70 are considered low, thus, all inexperienced evaluators who did not use the proposed diagrammatic scale and experienced evaluator 6 who presented low precision, were corrected with the use of the proposed diagrammatic scale. These results corroborate those of other validation studies of diagrammatic scales where there was an increase in the accuracy of visual evaluations of disease severity when using the proposed diagrammatic scales (Acco, Gomes, Matos, Ribeiro & Balbi-Peña, 2020;Alves et al, 2015;Nunes & Alves, 2012;Trojan & Pria, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to Mafia, Ferreira, Binoti and Leite (2011), R 2 values of up to 0.70 are considered low, thus, all inexperienced evaluators who did not use the proposed diagrammatic scale and experienced evaluator 6 who presented low precision, were corrected with the use of the proposed diagrammatic scale. These results corroborate those of other validation studies of diagrammatic scales where there was an increase in the accuracy of visual evaluations of disease severity when using the proposed diagrammatic scales (Acco, Gomes, Matos, Ribeiro & Balbi-Peña, 2020;Alves et al, 2015;Nunes & Alves, 2012;Trojan & Pria, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, approximately 91% of the evaluators had an angular coefficient substantially different from 1 (p = 0.05), with an average of 0.84 (Table 2). Values similar to these have been obtained in other diagrammatic scale assessment studies (Nascimento, Michereff, Mariano, & Gomes, 2005;Vivas et al, 2010;Damasceno et al, 2014).…”
Section: Evaluatorsupporting
confidence: 87%