2020
DOI: 10.25115/kasp.v1i4.4338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

El Papel De La Inteligencia Emocional en El Afrontamiento Resiliente Y La Satisfacción Con La Vida en Docentes

Abstract: El presente estudio tuvo como finalidad analizar la relación existente entre inteligencia emocional rasgo, afrontamiento resiliente y satisfacción con la vida en una muestra de docentes. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 195 docentes, siendo el 68% profesoras, con edades comprendidas entre los 25 y los 65 años (M = 47.84; DT = 9.61). El diseño del estudio fue de carácter descriptivo y correlacional. Los instrumentos de evaluación han sido: para evaluar la inteligencia emocional rasgo el cuestionario Trait Emotio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TMMS-24 scale evaluates three dimensions, with 8 items in each category: emotional perception (level of belief in one’s emotional focus); emotional understanding (subjective perception of one’s own emotions), and emotional regulation (belief in the ability to curb and regulate negative emotional moods and to boost positive ones). In our case, the internal reliability reached in the three dimensions was 0.87 (perception), 0.87 (understanding), and 0.81 (regulation), which are very similar data to those presented in previous studies, in which internal reliability varied between 0.84 and 0.88 [ 64 , 68 , 70 , 71 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The TMMS-24 scale evaluates three dimensions, with 8 items in each category: emotional perception (level of belief in one’s emotional focus); emotional understanding (subjective perception of one’s own emotions), and emotional regulation (belief in the ability to curb and regulate negative emotional moods and to boost positive ones). In our case, the internal reliability reached in the three dimensions was 0.87 (perception), 0.87 (understanding), and 0.81 (regulation), which are very similar data to those presented in previous studies, in which internal reliability varied between 0.84 and 0.88 [ 64 , 68 , 70 , 71 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%