AIP Conference Proceeding Volume 78 1982
DOI: 10.1063/1.33316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ejection of material from shocked surfaces of tin, tantalum and lead-alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when the release waves issued from the reflection of the shockwave onto the free surface reach the backside of our crystal, the system comes off the piston that was applied to support the shock. Then the crystal becomes isolated, and when the sheets are ejected, it loses a very small part of its velocity (momentum conservation) that can no more be compensated by the piston, unlike what occurs in hydro computations [1,[17][18] and experiments [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] where the samples have "infinite" (very large) dimensions. Other sources may also explain this difference; in particular the conditions of simulation (supported shockwave at extreme pressure).…”
Section: The Continuum Point Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, when the release waves issued from the reflection of the shockwave onto the free surface reach the backside of our crystal, the system comes off the piston that was applied to support the shock. Then the crystal becomes isolated, and when the sheets are ejected, it loses a very small part of its velocity (momentum conservation) that can no more be compensated by the piston, unlike what occurs in hydro computations [1,[17][18] and experiments [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] where the samples have "infinite" (very large) dimensions. Other sources may also explain this difference; in particular the conditions of simulation (supported shockwave at extreme pressure).…”
Section: The Continuum Point Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the distributions of the ejecta in size and velocity. Past theoretical and experimental efforts have shown that surface imperfections of machined material (in particular two-dimensional periodic features for metals) are the main cause of ejecta production [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In field a it is possible to find stationary shocks compatible with the flow illustrated in Fig. 1, and according surface of the Sn target (Andriot et al 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because the characteristic size of the ejecta is expected to be of same order as that of the geometrical defects in the surface, typically ~μm-or sub-μm, this process is sometimes referred to as microjetting. It has been widely studied under explosive loading and plate impacts, both behind free surfaces of random roughness, either "raw" [1] or enhanced on purpose [2][3][4][5], and behind defects of controlled shapes and depths [6,7]. In this paper, we show that laser shock loading of metallic samples with carefully prepared grooves can provide complementary data on microjetting, over a range of very high strain rates, very short pulse duration and small spatial scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%