1976
DOI: 10.1002/mana.19760720125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einige Klassen von endlichen GALOIS‐Moduln mit HASSE‐Prinzip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This proves the theorem. We conclude this paragraph with the following local-global-principle, which was pointed out to us by O. Neumann (see also [10] H~(k,A')-~[]H~(kp,A ') is injective and p therefore the theorem follows from the duality theorem of Tate and Poitou.…”
Section: • : I-i Hi(k~a)--~ Hi(ka)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This proves the theorem. We conclude this paragraph with the following local-global-principle, which was pointed out to us by O. Neumann (see also [10] H~(k,A')-~[]H~(kp,A ') is injective and p therefore the theorem follows from the duality theorem of Tate and Poitou.…”
Section: • : I-i Hi(k~a)--~ Hi(ka)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…If M is a commutative, finite and flat Kgroup scheme, let H i (G K , M) (respectively, H i (G v , M)) denote the Galois cohomology group H i (G K , M(K s )) (respectively, H i (G v , M(K s v ))). The validity of the Hasse principle for M(K s ), i.e., the injectivity of the canonical localization map H 1 (G K , M) → all v H 1 (G v , M) in Galois cohomology, has been discussed in [12,6]. See also [9], §I.9, pp.…”
Section: Statement Of the Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diese Bedingung ist wesentlich einfacher als die bei Neumann [13] im Falle p = 2 geforderte Zusatzvoraussetzung. Diese Bedingung ist wesentlich einfacher als die bei Neumann [13] im Falle p = 2 geforderte Zusatzvoraussetzung.…”
Section: Nun Ist Aber G(k'\l) = G(k(a')\k(a) N K(a'))^g(k(a 9 A')\k(aunclassified
“…Diese ist natürlich wesentlich eher zugänglich als die zweidimensionale, aber es handelt sich dabei um Fragen über die Kohomologie der proendlichen Gruppe G s = G(k s \k) 9 die ja erst erforscht werden soll. So lassen sich Ergebnisse von Beyer [2], Neumann [12], [13], Neukirch [10], [11] und Klingen [8] daraus ableiten. Das so gewonnene allgemeine Resultat ist Satz 6 in Abschnitt 4. .…”
unclassified