Einfluß der programmierten Sicherheitsmarge auf die Funktionszeit moderner Zweikammer-Schrittmacher

Abstract

In 55 consecutive patients with the same dual chamber pacemaker (Relay, Intermedics) and different pacing leads, the influence of different safety margins for pacing on battery current was investigated. 2.8 +/- 0.9 years after implantation, atrial and ventricular pulse-width thresholds (tRS) (ms) were determined at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 V, and the charge delivered at threshold was telemetered. If tRS was < 1.50 ms at 0.5 V, an amplitude of 1.0 V was programmed in the atrium and the ventricule; if tRS was < 1.50 ms at 1.0 V, then an amplitude of 2.0 V was chosen. Two times the charge threshold (2 x QRS), two times the voltage threshold (2 x URS), and three times the pulse-width threshold (3 x tRS) were programmed as the safety margins for pacing. With every safety margin, battery current (IBat) (microA) was averaged from 5 telemetric readings in D00 mode with 70 bpm. IBat was significantly lower with 2 x QRS as compared with 2 x URS (13.43 +/- 1.0 vs. 14.20 +/- 1.2 microA, p < 0.01) and as compared with 3 x tRS (13.99 +/- 1.2 microA, p < 0.05). Pacemaker longevity derived from these current data was significantly longer with 2 x QRS (112 +/- 8 months) as compared with 2 x URS (106 +/- 9, p < 0.01) and as compared with 3 x tRS (108 +/- 8, p < 0.05). If current consumption is compared intraindividually in dependance on the programmed amplitude, battery current is significantly lower at 1.0 V as compared with 2.0 V resulting in a mean reduction of 0.63 microA (-4.9%, p < 0.05) and an average gain in longevity of 5 months. This applies to every safety margin tested. Differences in battery current caused by the safety margins will translate into a greater gain in longevity in future pacemaker models with reduced internal current consumption.