In DDD-pacemaker patients with high degree AV block, Doppler echocardiography of transmitral blood flow can be used to find the individually optimal AV delay (AVO) for left heart AV synchronization. This study tried to validate a Doppler method (ECHO) recently proposed to optimize left ventricular filling by comparing it to stroke volume data derived from impedance cardiography (ICG). It should be further elucidated if optimizing the AV delay (AVD) by means of this method is superior to fixed AVD settings and which differential AVD (pace-sense-offset) should be programmed for atrially triggered (ATP) and AV sequential (AVP) pacing, respectively. AVO as measured in 53 patients showed a linear correlation between ECHO and ICG for both ATP (r = 0.66, P < 0.00001) and AVP (r = 0.53; P < 0.005). The mean deviation in AVO between ECHO and ICG was +/- 26 ms (ATP) and +/- 30 ms (AVP), respectively, with a tendency to longer AVDs with the Doppler method. ECHO limitations could mainly be attributed to: (1) restrictions of AVD programming options (which may be compensated for by slight modification of the proposal); and (2) to pathophysiological mechanisms that alter mitral valve dynamics. Optimization of the AVD by Doppler produced a stroke volume that was significantly higher (19%) than with a fixed AVD (150 ms in ATP; 200 ms in AVP). There was a wide scatter in pace-sense-offsets between-7 and 134 ms, which was reflected by both methods. It is concluded that AVO determinations by ECHO are valid provided that methodological pitfalls and limitations caused by the disease are recognized. Tailoring AVD with respect to diastolic filling improves systolic function and is superior to nominal AVD settings. Fixed differential AVDs as offered by some manufacturers are far from being physiological. Thus modern pulse generators should offer free programmability over a wide range of AV delays.

In atrial synchronous right ventricular pacing, if the AV delay is adapted individually, decreased QRS duration obtained by alternate pacing sites is significantly correlated with homogenization of left ventricular contraction and with increased systolic function in acute tests.

In db/db, a model of HFPEF, selective HR reduction by If-inhibition improved vascular stiffness, LV contractility, and diastolic function. Therefore, If-inhibition might be a therapeutic concept for HFPEF, if confirmed in humans.

In patients with LV dysfunction who need permanent ventricular pacing support, BV stimulation is superior to conventional RV pacing with regard to LV function, quality of life, and maximal as well as submaximal exercise capacity.

The sensitivity in detecting a PFO was markedly increased by femoral injection. This may be caused by different inflow patterns to the right atrium: inferior vena caval flow is directed to the right atrial septum, whereas superior vena caval flow is directed to the tricuspid valve. Thus, femoral injection may help to improve the detection of PFO and may explain the differences between TEE and TCD findings in previous studies.