2012
DOI: 10.1024/1016-264x/a000060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eine Normierungsstudie eines modifizierten Trail Making Tests im deutschsprachigen Raum

Abstract: Der Trail Making Test (TMT) ist ein international weit verbreitetes Verfahren, das z. B. zur Untersuchung von Patienten mit erworbenen Hirnschädigungen eingesetzt wird. Die Performanz im TMT wird mit unterschiedlichen neuropsychologischen Domänen, wie z. B. Aufmerksamkeit und Exekutivfunktionen, in Verbindung gebracht. Trotz der häufigen Anwendung im klinischen Alltag liegen bisher keine deutschsprachigen Normen für einen umfassenden Altersrange vor. Die vorliegende Untersuchung hat daher den Einfluss von Alte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of a larger pool of neuropsychological tests within the RIMCAD-study (for a comprehensive description see Conwell et al, 2018), we selected the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT), a German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (Lux et al, 1999) as a test of memory performance (Zhao et al, 2015), and The Trail Making Test (TMT) (Rodewald et al, 2012) as an indicator of cognitive flexibility (Kinsella et al, 2007).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of a larger pool of neuropsychological tests within the RIMCAD-study (for a comprehensive description see Conwell et al, 2018), we selected the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT), a German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (Lux et al, 1999) as a test of memory performance (Zhao et al, 2015), and The Trail Making Test (TMT) (Rodewald et al, 2012) as an indicator of cognitive flexibility (Kinsella et al, 2007).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time participants require for completing TMT part B has been reported as valid measure of executive functioning subdomain set-shifting [ 71 ] and will be used for analyses. In the present study, the Langensteinbacher version of the TMT (TMT-L) [ 72 ] will be applied. It will be operated via the Wiener Test-System (WTS) (Schuhfried, Vienna, Austria) and adequate psychometric properties have been reported for it [ 72 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the Langensteinbacher version of the TMT (TMT-L) [ 72 ] will be applied. It will be operated via the Wiener Test-System (WTS) (Schuhfried, Vienna, Austria) and adequate psychometric properties have been reported for it [ 72 ]. TMT-L parallel versions S1, S2 and S3 will be used in a random order at the 3 measurement time-points, but counterbalanced across participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcomes include per cent weight change from pre-treatment at 2 months (t1, post-treatment) and at 12-month follow-up (t3), derived from objectively measured body weight, in order to inform about treatment effects on early weight loss and on weight loss maintenance. Further, secondary outcomes consist of: executive functioning (t0, t1), as assessed through the Iowa Gambling Task, 67 Inhibition (Go/NoGo, StopSignal), 68 Delay Discounting Task, 69 Tower of London, 70 Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, 71 Trail Making Test 72 ; weight loss-related behaviours (t0–t3), including, self-efficacy (Generalised Self-Efficacy Scale), 73 74 eating behaviour (Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire), 75 76 and physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) 77 ; attendance to BWL sessions and retention as measures of patients’ adherence to a weight loss regimen; mental health (t0–t3), operatio­nalised as eating disorder psychopathology (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire 8), 78 general psychopathology (Patient Health Questionnaire) 79 80 and quality of life (Impact of Weight on Quality of Life) 81 82 ; and physical health (t0–t3), for which hip and waist circumference, blood pressure, bioelectrical impedance, and triceps and subscapularis skinfolds are measured. We chose these outcome measures because they cover clinically relevant aspects, exhibit good psychometric properties and are well-established in the German language as well as commonly used in international research studies on obesity.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%