1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02566106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ein Verzerrungssatz für schlichte Funktionen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will also obtain a two-point distortion theorem that actually characterizes Nehari functions. This result can be viewed as an analogue of a theorem of Blatter that characterizes the set of all univalent functions in D [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We will also obtain a two-point distortion theorem that actually characterizes Nehari functions. This result can be viewed as an analogue of a theorem of Blatter that characterizes the set of all univalent functions in D [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some years ago, Blatter [1] found a general two-point distortion theorem that is both necessary and sufficient for univalence and requires no normalization. His result is formulated in terms of the hyperbolic metric …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another measure of distortion is the distance |f (z 1 ) − f (z 2 )| between the images of two arbitrary points in the disk. Some years ago, Blatter [3] gave a sharp lower bound for this distance in terms of the hyperbolic distance between z 1 and z 2 . More recently, Chuaqui and Pommerenke [10] found a sharp two-point distortion theorem for functions whose Schwarzian derivative satisfies Nehari's condition |Sf (z)| ≤ 2(1 − |z| 2 ) −2 .…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the same hypotheses it turns out that the harmonic lift f actually satisfies a two-point distortion condition. The inequality will involve the function F determined by a Nehari function p as in the formula (3). In order to state the result in most elegant form, it will be convenient to assume that the given Nehari function is extremal, as defined in Section 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%