1999
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1999.188.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic properties of Nehari functions

Abstract: Let N be the set of all meromorphic functions f defined in the unit disc D that satisfy Nehari's univalence criterion (1 − |z| 2 ) 2 |Sf (z)| ≤ 2. In this paper we investigate certain properties of the class N . We obtain sharp estimates for the spherical distortion, and also a two-point distortion theorem that actually characterizes the set N . Finally, we study some aspects of the boundary behavior of Nehari functions, and obtain results that indicate how such maps can fail to map D onto a quasidisc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present paper we show more generally that for any δ > 0 the analytic functions with Schwarzian norm f ≤ 2(1 + δ 2 ) are characterized by the local distortion property (4) f (α, β) ≥ 1 δ sin(δ d(α, β)), α, β ∈ ‫,ބ‬ d(α, β) ≤ π δ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present paper we show more generally that for any δ > 0 the analytic functions with Schwarzian norm f ≤ 2(1 + δ 2 ) are characterized by the local distortion property (4) f (α, β) ≥ 1 δ sin(δ d(α, β)), α, β ∈ ‫,ބ‬ d(α, β) ≤ π δ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The proofs follow an argument given by Chuaqui and Pommerenke [4] to show that the condition (3) implies f ≤ 2. It will suffice to carry out the details only for the condition (8), because the proof for (7) is quite similar.…”
Section: Distortion Of Analytic Functionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The last inequality leads to the implication S ⊂ B 1 (6). Note here that the Koebe function k(z) = z/(1 − z) 2 satisfies the relation (1 − z 2 )T k (z) = 2z + 4, which shows the inequality (1) is sharp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%