2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1606.09479
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eikonal model analysis of elastic proton-proton collisions at 52.8 GeV and 8 TeV

Jiri Prochazka,
Vojtech Kundrat

Abstract: Under the influence of standardly used description of Coulomb-hadronic interference proposed by West and Yennie the protons have been interpreted as transparent objects; elastic events have been interpreted as more central than inelastic ones. It will be shown that using eikonal model the protons may be interpreted in agreement with usual ontological conception; elastic processes being more peripheral than inelastic ones. The corresponding results (differing fundamentally from the suggested hitherto models) wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that we are still very far from having right to neglect the proper sizes of the colliding protons.This means that we have to modify our expressions with including the proton electric form factors F (q 2 ) in the Coulomb phase. Actually these form factors can be identified with "effective form factors" as was introduced in [12]. We have now…”
Section: Account Of the Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We see that we are still very far from having right to neglect the proper sizes of the colliding protons.This means that we have to modify our expressions with including the proton electric form factors F (q 2 ) in the Coulomb phase. Actually these form factors can be identified with "effective form factors" as was introduced in [12]. We have now…”
Section: Account Of the Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 4) for the total amplitude T C+N remains valid in its general form but now in function Ξ α we keep δ C as in Eq. (12). To eliminate the dependence on the fictitious photon mass λ we use the old trick (see, e.g.…”
Section: Account Of the Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They break up at high collision energy values if the corresponding value of impact parameter is very low. A detailed discussion of analyses of experimental data under different assumptions (using the so-called eikonal model) and their impact on characteristics of protons may be found in a recent paper [29] that also includes a summary of historical context.…”
Section: B Elastic Scattering the Optical Theorem And Characteristics...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A peak in f (s, t) at |t| ∼ 0.5 GeV 2 corresponds to a peak in the profile function Γ(b) at large distances b ∼ 7.0/ |t| ∼ 2 fm (here 7.0 is the second maximum of the Bessel function J 0 (x)), However, a straightforward calculation of Γ(b) in this way does not give reliable results in the region where Γ(b) becomes very small and sensitive to assumed phase of the amplitude used, its spin structure, behavior at higher |t|, etc. Actually, more sophisticated and indirect approaches are to be used in order to analyze data on the described oscillation see, for example, [58][59][60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%