2018
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5716-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Once more on Coulomb-nuclear interference

Abstract: This is a critical reconsideration of the standard way of account for Coulomb-nuclear interference in the elastic scattering amplitude.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differential cross-section contains now the interference term is considered as one of the bona fide basic observables. Actually, the problem is much more complicated and we refer the interested reader to [13] where the issues of Coulomb-nuclear interference are reviewed and discussed.…”
Section: Basic Scattering Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential cross-section contains now the interference term is considered as one of the bona fide basic observables. Actually, the problem is much more complicated and we refer the interested reader to [13] where the issues of Coulomb-nuclear interference are reviewed and discussed.…”
Section: Basic Scattering Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been further verified for λ values down to 3 × 10 −6 GeV and agrees with the expectation from Eq. (1): introducing λ makes negligible effect whenever λ 2 |t|. In conclusion, we believe that we can choose λ sufficiently small such that the numerical calculation gives predictions comparable (on our |t| range starting at 10 −4 GeV 2 ) with the λ → 0 limit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Finally, the numerical approach used in this paper provides an explicit evaluation of the CNI to all orders of α, to our knowledge, for the first time. Petrov has also provided a formula to all orders of α [2] but, in our opinion, it is not well-suited for numerical evaluation. Petrov has recently published another and more explicit CNI formula including all orders of α [7], but we have not had a chance to test its numerical properties yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted here that such a negligibility is a model-dependent effect. In the framework of many models, the corresponding terms are expected to yield a significant contribution into the full amplitude (for detailed discussion, see, say, [11] and references therein).…”
Section: The Impact Of Electromagnetic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%