2014
DOI: 10.15361/1984-5529.2014v42n2p157-163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eficiência nutricional da soja RR na ausência do glifosato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of glyphosate did not change foliar concentrations (Figure 4). Despite the findings described by Serra et al (2011) and Zobiole et al (2012) concerning the negative effects of the glyphosate use on nutrient uptake, other studies indicate that mineral nutrition in GM plants is not affected by the glyphosate application (Duke et al 2012;Gonçalves et al 2014;Rosolem et al 2010) Despite the harmful effects observed with or without the glyphosate application, except for Zn at the rate of 0 kg ha −1 (control) on soybean grown in a Typic Quartzipsamment that showed visual symptoms of nutrient deficiency ( Figure 5). N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, B, Cu, Fe, and Mn concentration were within the 45.0 to 50.0 g kg −1 of N, 2.5 to 5.0 g kg −1 of P, 17.0 to 25.0 g kg −1 of K, 3.5 to 20.0 g kg −1 of Ca, 2.5 to 10.0 g kg −1 of Mg, 2.0 to 4.0 g kg −1 of S, 20 to 55 mg kg −1 of B, 6 to 14 mg kg −1 of Cu, 50 to 350 mg kg −1 of Fe, 20 to 100 mg kg −1 of Mn and 20 to 50 mg kg −1 of Zn concentration considered suitable by TPS (2013) for soybean cultivation.…”
Section: Foliar Nutrient Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of glyphosate did not change foliar concentrations (Figure 4). Despite the findings described by Serra et al (2011) and Zobiole et al (2012) concerning the negative effects of the glyphosate use on nutrient uptake, other studies indicate that mineral nutrition in GM plants is not affected by the glyphosate application (Duke et al 2012;Gonçalves et al 2014;Rosolem et al 2010) Despite the harmful effects observed with or without the glyphosate application, except for Zn at the rate of 0 kg ha −1 (control) on soybean grown in a Typic Quartzipsamment that showed visual symptoms of nutrient deficiency ( Figure 5). N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, B, Cu, Fe, and Mn concentration were within the 45.0 to 50.0 g kg −1 of N, 2.5 to 5.0 g kg −1 of P, 17.0 to 25.0 g kg −1 of K, 3.5 to 20.0 g kg −1 of Ca, 2.5 to 10.0 g kg −1 of Mg, 2.0 to 4.0 g kg −1 of S, 20 to 55 mg kg −1 of B, 6 to 14 mg kg −1 of Cu, 50 to 350 mg kg −1 of Fe, 20 to 100 mg kg −1 of Mn and 20 to 50 mg kg −1 of Zn concentration considered suitable by TPS (2013) for soybean cultivation.…”
Section: Foliar Nutrient Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The highest yield reported for BRS 245RR +Gly (Figure 3) can be probably due to the more efficient weed control. Rosolem et al (2010) and Gonçalves et al (2014) also found that the presence of the gene that confers resistance to glyphosate herbicide (RR) in the plant did not affect soybean development and yield.…”
Section: Seed Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistant plants are not affected by glyphosate, as they are insensitive to the action of this enzyme (Serra et al, 2011). However, there are questions about the effects on symbiotic bacteria, which do not have this same enzyme (Gonçalves et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entretanto, para obtenção de elevadas produtividades, observa-se a necessidade da utilização de novas tecnologias, como a transgenia, porém, sua utilização errônea pode provocar impactos ainda pouco divulgados (GONÇALVES et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified