2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient water recirculation for portable direct methanol fuel cells using electroosmotic pumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This generated power is greater than the power in the previous studies using silica nanochannels (2.9 pW) and a single‐pore polyimide membrane (26 pW) . Our RED cell can also be compared with other energy harvesting devices, and the current results show a similar or somewhat lower output power than, for example, an electrokinetic energy conversion device (pW to μW), an electromagnetic energy harvester (nW to μW), a piezoelectric energy harvester (nW to μW), and a micro fuel cell (μW to mW) . Such a comparison however should be done carefully because different energy harvesting devices are driven by different ambient energy sources, for example, mechanical work, temperature gradient, and concentration gradient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This generated power is greater than the power in the previous studies using silica nanochannels (2.9 pW) and a single‐pore polyimide membrane (26 pW) . Our RED cell can also be compared with other energy harvesting devices, and the current results show a similar or somewhat lower output power than, for example, an electrokinetic energy conversion device (pW to μW), an electromagnetic energy harvester (nW to μW), a piezoelectric energy harvester (nW to μW), and a micro fuel cell (μW to mW) . Such a comparison however should be done carefully because different energy harvesting devices are driven by different ambient energy sources, for example, mechanical work, temperature gradient, and concentration gradient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The net power density is defined as the power generation minus the external losses. The RED has merely the pumping loss as the external power consumption [26][27][28]. We computed the pumping power consumption as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that the membrane resistance can decrease with increasing the water uptake. An extensive analysis is yet to be performed for the major parameters of the NH 4 HCO 3 -RED system, compared with various conventional NaCl-RED system study [22][23][24][25][26][27]. The power reported in the previous studies is somewhat insufficient for practical applications [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is that in EOPs the average flow velocity is independent of the channel diameter, 11,12 unlike pressure-driven flow, where the average flow velocity decreases with the square of the channel diameter. EOP-based nanoporous membranes have been applied in various methods of analytical and physical chemistry, such as: liquidchromatography separation, 13 use of femto-liter pipettes, 14 micro-energy systems, 15 and micro-nanofluidic microchips. 16 A common challenge facing the field is that in many situations involving EOPs, there is a tendency for the microfluidic device to become clogged with aggregates of CPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%