2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00778-006-0021-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient updates in dynamic XML data: from binary string to quaternary string

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) which is compatible with the document order (we use the pre-order traversal number). For frequently updated XML data, we can use the encoding scheme of [14] to assign a unique ID to each node.…”
Section: A Data Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) which is compatible with the document order (we use the pre-order traversal number). For frequently updated XML data, we can use the encoding scheme of [14] to assign a unique ID to each node.…”
Section: A Data Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QED (Li and Ling, 2005;Li et al, 2008) and CDBS (Li et al, 2006a) remove the need of relabeling the nodes when the XML document is updated. In addition, they can be applied to different labeling schemes which need to maintain the order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relabeling the existing nodes is not required in the proposed algorithm. The QED (Li and Ling, 2005;Li et al, 2008) labeling approach is unable to guarantee inserting the labels with smallest size when some labels are deleted. Li et al (2006b) have suggested a reuse algorithm to modify QED labeling approach to find the smallest label lexicographically between two labels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations