“…As shown, the proposed methods are all very efficient in computation. Finally, with the above conclusions, we compare The proposed 2.5D-PRC with other coding-based run-length compression methods such as GOLOMB [11], FDR [12], ALT-FDR [13], EFDR [15], Huffman-coding-based SHC [7], VIHC [9], RL-HC [17], 9C [10] and BM [16]. The comparison results are presented in Table III, as can be seen, the proposed MD-PRC outperforms other methods in most cases.…”