2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11094-018-1898-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Synthesis of 21-Acetoxypregna-1,4,9(11),16-Tetraene-3,20-Dione, a Key Intermediate in the Synthesis of Highly Active Fluorinated Corticosteroids from 9α-Hydroxyandrostenedione

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the overall yield from phytosterols to pregnatetraenedione via 9-OHPDC-M was up to 35.4%, which was significantly higher than the diosgenin-pregnatetraenedione route (about 10%) and the 9-OHAD-pregnatetraenedione route (about 22.2%). 7,12 As for the production time of the new route, it was estimated to be about 10 days without taking into account the preparation and product purification processes: 6 days for the conversion of phytosterols to 9-OHPDC-M, 3–5 hours for the ester hydrolysis of 9-OHPDC-M to 9-OHPDC, 10–12 hours for the decarboxylation rearrangement of 9-OHPDC to 9-OHP-16-ene, 6–8 hours for the dehydration of 9-OHP-16-ene to P-9(11),16-diene, and 48 hours for the dehydrogenation of P-9(11),16-diene to pregnatetraenedione. This is close to the production time of the traditional phytosterol-based 9α-OHAD route, but significantly lower than that of the diosgenin-based route (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the overall yield from phytosterols to pregnatetraenedione via 9-OHPDC-M was up to 35.4%, which was significantly higher than the diosgenin-pregnatetraenedione route (about 10%) and the 9-OHAD-pregnatetraenedione route (about 22.2%). 7,12 As for the production time of the new route, it was estimated to be about 10 days without taking into account the preparation and product purification processes: 6 days for the conversion of phytosterols to 9-OHPDC-M, 3–5 hours for the ester hydrolysis of 9-OHPDC-M to 9-OHPDC, 10–12 hours for the decarboxylation rearrangement of 9-OHPDC to 9-OHP-16-ene, 6–8 hours for the dehydration of 9-OHP-16-ene to P-9(11),16-diene, and 48 hours for the dehydrogenation of P-9(11),16-diene to pregnatetraenedione. This is close to the production time of the traditional phytosterol-based 9α-OHAD route, but significantly lower than that of the diosgenin-based route (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it required only 5 steps from phytosterols to pregnatetraenedione, whereas the other two routes were composed of at least 8 steps. Second, all the reactions in the 9-OHPDC-M-pregnatetraenedione route proceeded under milder conditions, such as normal reaction temperature (25–30 °C) and pressure, whereas some reactions in the other two routes involved harsh conditions, such as the dehydration reaction of 16,17-epoxy-11alpha-hydroxypregn-1,4-diene-3,21-dione at −50 °C 48 and the opening reaction of the spiroketal ring system of diosgenin at 220 °C under 5 bar pressure 2 in the diosgenin-pregnatetraenedione route and the esterification of 17α-hydroxyl at 80–85 °C 7 in the 9-OHAD-pregnatetraenedione route. Third, the whole process of the 9-OHPDC-M-pregnatetraenedione route proceeded in aqueous phases and only methanol and acetone were needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations