2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient real coded genetic algorithm to solve the non-convex hydrothermal scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Avg. time (s) TPNN [9] 154808.5 -ALM [9] 154739 -PSO [18] 154705 - Table 2 reports the comparison of result for system 1 obtained by the proposed MCSA and other methods including Genetic algorithm in [2], Binary coded GA (BCGA) and real coded GA (RCGA) in [3], classical evolutionary programming (CEP), Fast EP (FEP) and improved Fast EP (IFEP) in [5], global constriction PSO (GCPSO), global weight factor PSO (GWPSO), Local constriction PSO (LCPSO) and local weight factor PSO (LWPSO) in [6], enhanced PSO (EPSO) in [7], and differential evolutionary (DE) in [9]. As observed from the table, the proposed method obtains better minimum cost, average cost and maximum cost than all methods available in the table.…”
Section: Case 1: Two Systems With Quadratic Fuel Cost Function Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Avg. time (s) TPNN [9] 154808.5 -ALM [9] 154739 -PSO [18] 154705 - Table 2 reports the comparison of result for system 1 obtained by the proposed MCSA and other methods including Genetic algorithm in [2], Binary coded GA (BCGA) and real coded GA (RCGA) in [3], classical evolutionary programming (CEP), Fast EP (FEP) and improved Fast EP (IFEP) in [5], global constriction PSO (GCPSO), global weight factor PSO (GWPSO), Local constriction PSO (LCPSO) and local weight factor PSO (LWPSO) in [6], enhanced PSO (EPSO) in [7], and differential evolutionary (DE) in [9]. As observed from the table, the proposed method obtains better minimum cost, average cost and maximum cost than all methods available in the table.…”
Section: Case 1: Two Systems With Quadratic Fuel Cost Function Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, several artificial intelligence algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA) [2][3], two-phase neural network [4], evolutionary programming technique (EP) [5], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [6][7], differential evolution [8][9], and clonal selection algorithm (CSA) [10] have been widely and successfully applied for solving the ST-CHTS problems where quadratic and/or nonconvex fuel cost function of thermal units are considered. Among the methods, GA is the worst one since it obtains very high fuel cost, high constraint violation and long execution time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of elite-preserving operator can be done by directly copying the best 10% chromosomes from the current population to the next generation [67]. …”
Section: Elite-preserving Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutation rate changes self-adaptively with the increase of the generation number and which is decided by the individual fitness and the overall performance of population (Kumar and Naresh, 2007)…”
Section: Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%