2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2014.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient QoS provisioning at the MAC layer in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks

Abstract: International audienceNew emerging applications for wireless sensor networks, such as mission-critical and multimedia applications, require sensing heterogeneous phenomena, and that the network supports different types of QoS-constrained traffic at variable rates. Designing an efficient medium access control protocol allowing these applications to work properly while coping with the limited resources of sensor networks is a challenging task. In this paper, we present a new adaptive MAC protocol with QoS suppor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses a service differentiation mechanism based on a spatial correlativity model of nodes and on the perceived data by the nodes in order to select nodes close to the information and prioritize their high quality data in the access channel. The authors in [ 9 ] proposed an adaptive QoS-aware MAC protocol for WSNs with heterogeneous traffic. This protocol uses a hybrid channel access method by combining the strength of both contention-based and contention-free MAC protocols.…”
Section: From Optimal To Adaptive and Viable Management Of Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a service differentiation mechanism based on a spatial correlativity model of nodes and on the perceived data by the nodes in order to select nodes close to the information and prioritize their high quality data in the access channel. The authors in [ 9 ] proposed an adaptive QoS-aware MAC protocol for WSNs with heterogeneous traffic. This protocol uses a hybrid channel access method by combining the strength of both contention-based and contention-free MAC protocols.…”
Section: From Optimal To Adaptive and Viable Management Of Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such is the case of the queuing model for the IEEE 802.11, presented in (Tickoo and Sikdar, 2008). In addition, most of the existing methods for obtaining the probability distribution of report latency in WSNs are protocol specific; e.g., (Souil et al, 2014;Siddiqui and Ghani, 2013). More specifically, a QoS evaluation of the AMPH protocol is conducted in (Souil et al, 2014), but despite the in-depth analysis, the selected network topology and protocol compromise the adaptability of the developed method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Siddiqui and Ghani, 2013), authors obtain the probability distribution of a successful and failed transmission by means of a Markov Chain. Note that in both (Souil et al, 2014;Siddiqui and Ghani, 2013), delay is calculated as the time required for the first successful transmission to occur, whereas the transmission of a minimum number of packets may be necessary for the accurate characterization of the occurring event. In (Wang et al, 2011), authors do consider the need for the transmission of a minimum number of event packets during event reporting and propose a spatio-temporal fluid model, along with a simplified model to obtain the distribution of report delay in multihop WSNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent studies have focused on energy efficiency, packet loss rate (PLR), and channel utilization efficiency. [9][10][11] However, the critical factor of transmission delay in smart grid WMSNs has not been fully considered in these papers. Chen 12 proposed a self-stabilizing hop-constrained energy-efficient (SHE) protocol for constructing minimum-energy networks for hard real-time routing; the transmission delay in a WSN was quantified, and the delay requirement was met, but this system does not provide a means of prioritizing messages and thus cannot satisfy the needs of smart grid WMSNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%