2014
DOI: 10.5121/sipij.2014.5208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient PU Mode Decision and Motion Estimation for H.264/AVC to HEVC Transcoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the proposed approach gets better speed-ups for sequences with complex motion activities, such as RaceHorses and Keiba, and worse speedups for sequences with simple motion activities and high intra modes proportion, like Mobisode2 and Flowervase. Finally, the proposed approach achieves an average speed-up (7.89x) better than related approaches, such as Chen et al [11] (1.79x), Jiang et al [4] (2.00x) and Peixoto et al [5] (3.83x), for instance. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the proposed approach gets better speed-ups for sequences with complex motion activities, such as RaceHorses and Keiba, and worse speedups for sequences with simple motion activities and high intra modes proportion, like Mobisode2 and Flowervase. Finally, the proposed approach achieves an average speed-up (7.89x) better than related approaches, such as Chen et al [11] (1.79x), Jiang et al [4] (2.00x) and Peixoto et al [5] (3.83x), for instance. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Several fast mode decision approaches have been proposed in the literature [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For example, Fang et al use H.264 modes, encoded residual and variance of motion vectors (MVs) to skip some prediction unit (PU) modes [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in light of the various steps performed in RFA, we believe that our algorithm could be more easily adapted to hardware implementation, and that, in conclusion, it is suited to cases where RFA would be too slow or introduce too much delay. In Table 13 we compare FA+QTL+MVR to FMD-FME [4] and [5]. For brevity, we report here only the average of the transcoding results, which were obtained on the sequences of classes B, C and D. As for the RFA case, we observe that the proposed method is faster than references even though it provides a larger coding rate.…”
Section: Low Delay Configurationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The mode decision algorithm is more complicated and depends on the partition of H.264 macroblocks (see [4] for more details). Finally, in [5] FMD-FME is enhanced by considering PU-level information. The proposed transcoding scheme is still complicated but the transcoding performance in terms of BD-Rate increase and transcoding speedup are very close to [4].…”
Section: Avc To Hevc Transcoders In Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation