2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-016-3498-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AVC to HEVC transcoder based on quadtree limitation

Abstract: Following the finalization of the state-of-the-art High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard in January 2013, several new services are being deployed in order to take advantage of the superior coding efficiency (estimated at 50 % less bitrate for the same visual quality) that this standard provides over its predecessor: H.264 / Advanced Video Coding (AVC). However, the switch from AVC to HEVC is not trivial as most video content is still encoded in AVC. Consequently, there is a growing need for fast AVC to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show the better performance of the proposed transcoding method in both scenarios, we show the performances both in LP configuration and RA configuration. Among them, Table 5 shows a comparison between the proposed algorithm and two other transcoding methods, namely CSVT2014 [12] and MTA2016 [7]; all compared methods use the LP configuration. It can be seen from Table 5 that the proposed transcoding algorithm reduces complexity by 75.3% on average, and that it outperforms the other two algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To show the better performance of the proposed transcoding method in both scenarios, we show the performances both in LP configuration and RA configuration. Among them, Table 5 shows a comparison between the proposed algorithm and two other transcoding methods, namely CSVT2014 [12] and MTA2016 [7]; all compared methods use the LP configuration. It can be seen from Table 5 that the proposed transcoding algorithm reduces complexity by 75.3% on average, and that it outperforms the other two algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peixoto used the similarity of the motion vectors (MVs) in H.264/AVC to decide which HEVC CU partitions should be tested [6]. In [7], Mora et al present an H.264/AVC to HEVC transcoder, in which decoded H.264/AVC blocks are first fused according to their motion similarity. A motion‐homogeneous‐based H.264/AVC to HEVC transcoding method is proposed in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17] a transcoding algorithm is proposed that makes use of intra and inter coding information and MVs in H.264 to accelerate the re-encoding in HEVC. In [18], incoming H.264 blocks are fused according to a motion similarity criterion. The map is used to help in constructing the quadtree of HEVC coded frames.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their algorithms achieved a speedup of 2.31× on average with a BD-rate penalty of 3.4%. Mora et al [20] also proposed an H.264/AVC to HEVC transcoder based on quadtree limitation, where the fusion map generated by the motion similarity of decoded H.264/AVC blocks is used to limit the quadtree of HEVC coded frames. They achieved 63% time saving with only a 1.4% bitrate increase.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%