2011
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2010.2071830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Partial-Parallel Decoder Architecture for Quasi-Cyclic Nonbinary LDPC Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also indicate if the results are post-synthesis or estimated, if the results are only for a part of the architecture, and the technology used. Despite the implementation results shown in Table 2, where the algorithms in [13] and [14] seem to be more efficient than the algorithm in [9], in [9] it is shown that this is more efficient in terms of throughput over area ratio than the previous work of the same authors [11][12][13][14][15]. On the other hand, the recent architecture proposed in [4], which has lower throughput over area ratio than [9], has introduced other advantages such as a configurable architecture.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We also indicate if the results are post-synthesis or estimated, if the results are only for a part of the architecture, and the technology used. Despite the implementation results shown in Table 2, where the algorithms in [13] and [14] seem to be more efficient than the algorithm in [9], in [9] it is shown that this is more efficient in terms of throughput over area ratio than the previous work of the same authors [11][12][13][14][15]. On the other hand, the recent architecture proposed in [4], which has lower throughput over area ratio than [9], has introduced other advantages such as a configurable architecture.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Table 1 summarizes the hardware requirements and performance of the proposed decoder and also other partially-parallel decoders reported in the literature. Among the partially-parallel decoder architectures reviewed [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], only those implemented on Xilinx Virtex 4 and Virtex 5 FPGA are listed in Table 1. Although Virtex 5 has performance advantage over Virtex 4, the decoders implemented on the former device [38,39] require comparatively more resources and also achieve substantially less throughput than the proposed decoder on Virtex 4 FPGA.…”
Section: Analysis Of Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decoding gain over MS 0.5dB 0 0 * Here REG indicates 1-bit register. † 1-bit REG is converted to three 2-input XOR according to [22]. ‡ Hardware efficiency is the ratio of throughput to total gate count.…”
Section: Peformance Anaylsis and Comparsionmentioning
confidence: 99%