2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient offset trimming for deformable planar curves using a dynamic hierarchy of bounding circular arcs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1995, Meek and Walton [21] introduced the concept of BCA as a handy tool for proving the cubic convergence of G 1 biarc approximation of planar B-spline curves. To the best of our knowledge, this bounding volume has never been used for the purpose of accelerating geometric algorithms until Lee et al [19] first used BCA as a tool for speeding up the offset trimming algorithm for planar freeform curves. We believe that BCA has a great potential in accelerating many other geometric algorithms for planar curves, which is the main motivation of the current work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1995, Meek and Walton [21] introduced the concept of BCA as a handy tool for proving the cubic convergence of G 1 biarc approximation of planar B-spline curves. To the best of our knowledge, this bounding volume has never been used for the purpose of accelerating geometric algorithms until Lee et al [19] first used BCA as a tool for speeding up the offset trimming algorithm for planar freeform curves. We believe that BCA has a great potential in accelerating many other geometric algorithms for planar curves, which is the main motivation of the current work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is time consuming to measure the maximum deviation of biarcs from the given curve and thus to determine the thickness of fat arcs. In a recent work on trimming planar offset curves, Lee et al [19] showed that the bounding circular arcs (BCA) of Meek and Walton [21] is considerably more efficient to generate and measure the error bound than fat arcs. In this paper, we compare the relative performance of the BCA-bounding region against spiral fat arcs (SFA) [4] (each constructed with two circular arcs and two line segments) and bilens [17] (with two biarcs, i.e., four circular arcs), all of which are planar curve approximation methods of cubic convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the fat-arc BVH, [Kim et al (2012)] demonstrated highly improved performance in the efficiency as well as the robustness in trimming the planar curve offset self-intersections. [Lee et al (2015a)] further improved the efficiency of planar offset trimming by using a BVH of bounding circular arcs (BCA). [Meek and Walton (1995)] introduced the concept of BCA for the purpose of proving the cubic convergence of their biarc approximation to planar curves.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the planar case, non-convex bounding regions such as fat arcs (FA) and bounding circular arcs (BCA) are highly effective in accelerating geometric algorithms (such as intersection [Sederberg et al (1989)], offset [Lee et al (2015a)], medial axis, and Voronoi diagram computations [Lee et al (2016)]) for planar freeform curves. (Fat arc is an expansion of arc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%