2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-015-1093-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three bounding regions with cubic convergence to planar freeform curves

Abstract: We compare the relative performance of bounding regions generated by three different curve-bounding methods with cubic convergence to planar freeform curves: spiral fat arcs (SFA) (Barton and Elber in Graph Models 73(2):50-57, 2011), bilens (Kumosenko in Comput Aided Geom Des 30(3):310-330, 2013), and bounding circular arcs (BCA) (Meek and Walton in J Comput Appl Math 59 (2): [221][222][223][224][225][226][227][228][229][230][231] 1995). For quantitative comparison, we consider three different criteria: geomet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher-order convergence to a univariate curve (i.e., the profile curve), not directly to a bivariate surface, is the main source for the outperformance of our approach in the data reduction. (See [Lee et al (2015b)] for comparisons among bounding For each pair of static solid models in Figure 7, we have also computed the minimum distances between the two models at 50,000 different frames taken from their continuous motion. Figure 11 shows some snapshots of the test for the pairs of (table, lightmil) and (pawn, bottle) models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher-order convergence to a univariate curve (i.e., the profile curve), not directly to a bivariate surface, is the main source for the outperformance of our approach in the data reduction. (See [Lee et al (2015b)] for comparisons among bounding For each pair of static solid models in Figure 7, we have also computed the minimum distances between the two models at 50,000 different frames taken from their continuous motion. Figure 11 shows some snapshots of the test for the pairs of (table, lightmil) and (pawn, bottle) models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other papers by Biswas et al [4] and Sa et al [5] focus on the topic of 3D modeling with an application in 3D printing. The three last papers by Lee et al [6], Bohl et al [7] and Paulus et al [8] are about the performance analysis of bounding regions, the modeling of 3D fruits and the virtual cutting of deformable objects.…”
Section: Articles In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%