2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Nutrient Management for High Crop Yield and Quality in Wheat Crop in Central Uttar Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…application 20, 10 and 10 Kg N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O/ ha, respectively for the post-flood rice crop only) and in control treatment. Similar kind of results has been reported by Ravichandran et al (2006), Jana et al (2009) and Trivedi et al (2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…application 20, 10 and 10 Kg N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O/ ha, respectively for the post-flood rice crop only) and in control treatment. Similar kind of results has been reported by Ravichandran et al (2006), Jana et al (2009) and Trivedi et al (2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Regmi et al, (2003) also found consistently higher yield of rice in the NPK treatments than in treatments where one or more nutrients were lacking in case of a 20-years experiment. Further, 100% NPK + 5 Kg/ha Zn (along with S @ 40 kg/ha) in case of rice was reported to be best for the farmers so far as grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake values are concerned (Trivedi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the sixties, the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi served as flagship of the Indian wheat programme. The All India Coordinated Wheat Improvement Project initiated in 1965, (2018) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com A field scale experiment was conducted on wheat crop in entisol of Crop Research Farm Nawabganj, C. S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur during 2016-17 Indo-Gangetic alluvium of Central U.P. The treatments were Control, 100% NPK (120:60:60 kg ha -1 ), 100% NPK+S 40, 100% NPK+Zn 5 , 100% NPK+S 40 +Zn 5 , 125% NPK, 125% NPK+S 40 , 125% NPK+Zn 5 , 125% NPK+S 40 +Zn 5 and 150% NPK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%