2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2005.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient mine microseismic monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the border region of mined-out cavities, induced Coulomb stress changes lead to a large number of brittle failure events, sometimes expressed as rockfalls or rockbursts (e.g., Gibowicz and Kijko, 1994;Richardson and Jordan, 2002). These events are termed "border fractures" in this paper and pose a considerable risk to life and property (e.g., Young et al, 1992;Ge, 2005). Most of the microseismic (MS) and acoustic emission (AE) events observed in the mining environment are linked to such failure processes in the excavation damage zone close to the cavities, as well as in the regions in the immediate vicinity of cavities (e.g., Gibowicz and Kijko, 1994;Richardson and Jordan, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the border region of mined-out cavities, induced Coulomb stress changes lead to a large number of brittle failure events, sometimes expressed as rockfalls or rockbursts (e.g., Gibowicz and Kijko, 1994;Richardson and Jordan, 2002). These events are termed "border fractures" in this paper and pose a considerable risk to life and property (e.g., Young et al, 1992;Ge, 2005). Most of the microseismic (MS) and acoustic emission (AE) events observed in the mining environment are linked to such failure processes in the excavation damage zone close to the cavities, as well as in the regions in the immediate vicinity of cavities (e.g., Gibowicz and Kijko, 1994;Richardson and Jordan, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, monitoring programs to mitigate risks during the active mining process are carried out by the operators of the mine (e.g., Gibowicz, 1989;Gibowicz and Kijko, 1994;Trifu, 2002;Trifu, 2010). The aim of this monitoring is to identify regions that may be susceptible to rockbursts or structural damage (e.g., Young et al, 1992;Ge, 2005) or to decide when a safe re-entry to the mine is possible after a rockburst or larger event (e.g., Vallejos and McKinnon, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used in the continuous real-time monitoring of the occurrence, development, and evolution of micro fractures in the rock mass [10][11][12][13]. Xu et al [14,15] proposed a rock mass damage evolutional model based on microseismic data and conducted a feedback analysis of the left bank slope stability combined with a 3D finite element method (FEM) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the significant advantages, microseismic monitoring technique has been widely used in many projects and achieved remarkable achievements, such as deep mines, tunnels, slope and underground laboratory at South Africa, Canada, the United States and China [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Jianpo Liu et al [8] established microseismic monitoring system in Hongtou Mountain Copper Mine to study the relationship between microseismic activities and mining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%