2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6441-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient genetic algorithm for multi-objective robust optimization of machining parameters with taking into account uncertainties

Abstract: The respect of the machined piece quality and productivity is closely related to the mastery of uncertain factors. Indeed, the efficient solutions obtained from the machining parameter optimization based on classical methods are assigned of uncertain deviations which affect the cutting process. In the present paper, we propose multi-and monoobjective optimization approach of parameter turning with taking into account both production constraints related to piece quality, to machine power, or to tool life, than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereafter, a comparison between the robust optima (under uncertainty) and efficient optima (classical) is processed. For this, the developed genetic algorithm MC-GA is used for its efficiency to treat the optimization problems under uncertainty [9]. The proposed "robust" genetic algorithm contains the same steps as the "deterministic" genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thereafter, a comparison between the robust optima (under uncertainty) and efficient optima (classical) is processed. For this, the developed genetic algorithm MC-GA is used for its efficiency to treat the optimization problems under uncertainty [9]. The proposed "robust" genetic algorithm contains the same steps as the "deterministic" genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two parameters are the (9) tool feed ( f ) and depth of cut (a p ). Their variabilities are assumed to follow a uniform distribution.…”
Section: The Uncertain Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, an efficient optimum is defined as the global minimum of the objective function. Thus, upon the resolution of robust optimization problems, particularly in [12,13], the use of safety coefficients under another name (penalty factors) is taken up in the penalistic formulation of constraint functions. But, the penalty factor is not related directly to the requirements of a reliable machining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the penalty factor is not related directly to the requirements of a reliable machining. As stated in [13], overestimation of the penalty factor can lead to less efficient solutions of the optimization problem, and even that there would be no solutions because of the closure or distortion of search space. To remove this ambiguity, an approach to determine the optimum cutting conditions with consideration of uncertainty, called 'probabilistic optimization', has emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%