2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2721876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient field emission from an individual aligned carbon nanotube bundle enhanced by edge effect

Abstract: The authors report on the field emission from an aligned carbon nanotube (CNT) bundle grown by thermal chemical vapor deposition. The CNT bundle showed a low-threshold electric field of 2.0V∕μm that produced a current density of 10mA∕cm2, sustainable evolution of current density up to 2.8A∕cm2 at 2.9V∕μm, and good emission stability without degradation for 200h of continuous dc emission. By calculating the electric-field distribution, it was found that the electric field was significantly higher at the edge of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the turn-on field (at 1 µA/cm 2 ) and the threshold field (at 10 mA/cm 2 ) for CNTs are found to be less than 1 and 5 V/µm, respectively. [29][30][31] The turn-on field that we obtain for the ZnO nanostructures in the present work is in the range of 1-3 V/µm, and the corresponding threshold field could be higher than 5 V/µm. The lower performance is believed to be due to the larger diameter of individual ZnO nanopillars (∼100 nm) than CNTs (<20 nm) and to the lower conductivity of ZnO nanostructures than CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In particular, the turn-on field (at 1 µA/cm 2 ) and the threshold field (at 10 mA/cm 2 ) for CNTs are found to be less than 1 and 5 V/µm, respectively. [29][30][31] The turn-on field that we obtain for the ZnO nanostructures in the present work is in the range of 1-3 V/µm, and the corresponding threshold field could be higher than 5 V/µm. The lower performance is believed to be due to the larger diameter of individual ZnO nanopillars (∼100 nm) than CNTs (<20 nm) and to the lower conductivity of ZnO nanostructures than CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, during the field emission measurement, arcing was usually observed under a high electric field from the CNT emitters fabricated by the screen-printing or the spraying methods whereas it was very rare from the CNT emitters fabriform the cathode. The edge of the circular disk was ground to avoid edge emission [13]. Then, the conductive adhesive tape with CNT film faced up was set on the protruded circular disk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, the cathode structure is opposed by a planar anode, a diode configuration. The increase in electric field at the edge of the pillar has been associated with the performance improvement observed for CPAs when compared to other CNT structures [5,6].…”
Section: Sponsor/monitor's Report Number(s)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to the relatively simple fabrication process and high reproducibility of CPAs, we are able to utilize these structures for the integration of the gate electrode. CPAs can be grown from patterned catalysts on substrates like Si or directly on bulk metallic alloy substrates that have been patterned with metal film layers that inhibit CNT growth [5,6]. Both of these fabrication methods yield CNT emitter structures that exhibit low turn-on fields and also excellent structural stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%