2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2013.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient feature-preserving local projection operator for geometry reconstruction

Abstract: This paper proposes an efficient and Feature-preserving Locally Optimal Projection operator (FLOP) for geometry reconstruction. Our operator is bilateral weighted, taking both spatial and geometric feature information into consideration for feature-preserving approximation. We then present an accelerated FLOP operator based on the random sampling of the Kernel Density Estimate (KDE), which produces reconstruction results close to those generated using the complete point set data, to within a given accuracy. Ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We will show that this concept is compatible with our continuous LOP formulation and can be adopted without any additional effort. Kernel LOP (KLOP) [Liao et al 2013] reduces the computation cost of LOP by subsampling the point cloud using a kernel density estimate (KDE). While this reduction achieves a decent acceleration, reducing the number of discrete input samples also constrains the number of usable resampling particles [Lipman et al 2007], thus the general reconstruction quality deteriorates quickly for a small number of kernels.…”
Section: Lop and Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will show that this concept is compatible with our continuous LOP formulation and can be adopted without any additional effort. Kernel LOP (KLOP) [Liao et al 2013] reduces the computation cost of LOP by subsampling the point cloud using a kernel density estimate (KDE). While this reduction achieves a decent acceleration, reducing the number of discrete input samples also constrains the number of usable resampling particles [Lipman et al 2007], thus the general reconstruction quality deteriorates quickly for a small number of kernels.…”
Section: Lop and Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to fully assess the performance of our system, we do not currently exploit any frame-to-frame coherence. However, common temporal-coherence approaches could accelerate our system even further [Liao et al 2013]. Note that for normal estimation, we simply orient the normals towards the camera when rendering the reconstructed point cloud.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we inherit the limitations discussed in section 6, we believe our method has the potential to benefit the skeleton extraction research of animated surfaces. In the future, we will apply the proposed method to the geometry reconstruction and editing of time‐varying surfaces .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locally Optimal Projector (LOP) related methods (Huang et al, 2009(Huang et al, , 2013Liao et al, 2013;Lipman et al, 2007;Preiner et al, 2014) have recently attracted much attention for its robustness against outliers. The core of LOP operator is to project an arbitrary number of particles to a point set to represent the local L 1 median of the original point set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%