1992
DOI: 10.1016/0307-904x(92)90046-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient evaluation of integrals in three-dimensional boundary element method using linear shape functions over plane triangular elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be proved that integral (22) admits of the following closed form expression in the local coordinate system L: …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be proved that integral (22) admits of the following closed form expression in the local coordinate system L: …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical integrations have been basically performed in 2D (only a few works appeared in the 3D context, see e.g. [21][22][23]), towards different schemes. In the first scheme (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical implementation requires considerable care [1] because it involves evaluation of singular (weak, strong and hyper) integrals. Some of the notable two-dimensional (while all the devices are 3D by definition, useful insight is often obtained by performing a 2D analysis) and three-dimensional approaches used to evaluate the singular integrals are discussed in [1,2] and [3,4,5,6,7] and the references in these papers. It is wellunderstood that many of the difficulties in the available BEM solvers stem from the assumption of nodal concentration of singularities which leads to various mathematical difficulties and to the infamous numerical boundary layers [8,9,33] when the source is placed very close to the field point ( [2] and references [4][5][6] therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the notable two-dimensional (while all the devices are 3D by definition, useful insight is often obtained by performing a 2D analysis) and three-dimensional approaches used to evaluate the singular integrals are discussed in [1,2] and [3,4,5,6,7] and the references in these papers. It is wellunderstood that many of the difficulties in the available BEM solvers stem from the assumption of nodal concentration of singularities which leads to various mathematical difficulties and to the infamous numerical boundary layers [8,9,33] when the source is placed very close to the field point ( [2] and references [4][5][6] therein). While mathematical singularities (that occur when the source and field points coincide) have been shown to be artifacts, several techniques have been used to remove difficulties related to physical or geometrical singularities (that occur when boundaries are degenerate, i.e., geometrically singular, or due to a jump in boundary conditions) such as gaussian quadrature integration, mapping techniques for regularization, bicubic transformation, nonlinear transformation and dual BEM techniques [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some researchers have been looking for semi-analytical solutions or sophisticated approaches in order to improve the accuracy of BEM models used to solve specific problems [18]. Niu et al [19] proposes a semi-analytical algorithm for 3D elastic problems that require the evaluation of nearly strongly singular and hypersingular integrals on the triangular and quadrilateral elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%