2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient discovery of responses of proteins to compounds using active learning

Abstract: BackgroundDrug discovery and development has been aided by high throughput screening methods that detect compound effects on a single target. However, when using focused initial screening, undesirable secondary effects are often detected late in the development process after significant investment has been made. An alternative approach would be to screen against undesired effects early in the process, but the number of possible secondary targets makes this prohibitively expensive.ResultsThis paper describes me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
62
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, active learning can successfully navigate different projections of ligand-receptor spaces. Consistent with previous applications of active learning [58], we could show that family-dependent sequence similarities captured by the dipeptide descriptors can yield predictive chemogenomics models. However, applications that study the subtle pharmacology between similar proteins or multiple binding pockets might require alternative, more detailed descriptors that capture the structure of protein cavities relevant to ligand binding.…”
Section: Model Size and Parameterssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, active learning can successfully navigate different projections of ligand-receptor spaces. Consistent with previous applications of active learning [58], we could show that family-dependent sequence similarities captured by the dipeptide descriptors can yield predictive chemogenomics models. However, applications that study the subtle pharmacology between similar proteins or multiple binding pockets might require alternative, more detailed descriptors that capture the structure of protein cavities relevant to ligand binding.…”
Section: Model Size and Parameterssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It was previously shown that active learning could query separate ligand-or target-based models to aid in improving the understanding of polypharmacological networks [58]. We have extended this hypothesis using chemogenomic modeling to capture the combined ligand-target space and aim at extrapolating knowledge from the interaction patterns.…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the area of drug discovery, active learning has been shown to efficiently derive high-performance prediction models based on small subsets of input data [32,34,39,46]. Furthermore, actively trained models not only reached significantly higher hit rates compared to experimental standards which frequently remain below 1 % in cases of unbiased chemical libraries [34,39,40,[47][48][49], but such models also contributed to successful identification of novel bioactive compounds [33,36,42] and cancer rescue mutants of p53 [31]. Overall, AL approaches bear the potential to improve drug discovery processes by increasing hit rates, reducing the amount of time-and cost-intensive experimentation, and accelerate hit-to-lead processes through integration into a feedback-driven experimentation workflow [33,36,42,43,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several pro-and retrospective studies report successful applications of AL strategies throughout different fields of research [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. In the area of drug discovery, active learning has been shown to efficiently derive high-performance prediction models based on small subsets of input data [32,34,39,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%