2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.120.220502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Classical Algorithm for Boson Sampling with Partially Distinguishable Photons

Abstract: We demonstrate how boson sampling with photons of partial distinguishability can be expressed in terms of interference of fewer photons. We use this observation to propose a classical algorithm to simulate the output of a boson sampler fed with photons of partial distinguishability. We find conditions for which this algorithm is efficient, which gives a lower limit on the required indistinguishability to demonstrate a quantum advantage. Under these conditions, adding more photons only polynomially increases th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
153
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let U be an m×m Haarrandom matrix, where m n O 2 = ( ), and denote by  the probability distribution over outcomes generated by a boson sampling computer, i.e. with probabilities given by equation (10). Suppose there is a classical algorithm  that takes as input the unitary matrix U and an error bound 0  > and outputs a sample from some distribution ¢ such that    -¢ <   , in time poly n, 1  ( ).…”
Section: Complexity-theoretic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let U be an m×m Haarrandom matrix, where m n O 2 = ( ), and denote by  the probability distribution over outcomes generated by a boson sampling computer, i.e. with probabilities given by equation (10). Suppose there is a classical algorithm  that takes as input the unitary matrix U and an error bound 0  > and outputs a sample from some distribution ¢ such that    -¢ <   , in time poly n, 1  ( ).…”
Section: Complexity-theoretic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly after the seminal boson sampling [3] paper was published, several works started investigating the effects of realistic experimental imperfections on the idealized theoretical model. The robustness of boson sampling was analyzed under the effect of partial photon distinguishability [9,10], fabrication imperfections on the linear-optical transformation [11][12][13], losses [14,15], probabilistic sources [16] and so on. On the experimental side, several small-scale implementations of boson sampling have been reported so far [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], with state-of-the-art implementations with up to four and five photons using near-deterministic quantum dot sources [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where * indicates the complex conjugate. In other words, when we know how to represent the wave functions in either the time or frequency domain, we can use it to calculate | ψ | ϕ | 2 in (108) or (109).…”
Section: The Hong-ou-mandel Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, photonadded coherent states [16] and quantum superpositions of coherent states (cat states) [17] have been claimed to yield hard-to-simulate outputs. Partially distinguishable photons seem to yield an intermediate regime deserving further investigation [18][19][20][21]. The effect of losses on simulation complexity was also considered [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%