2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2013.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient allocation of resources in multiple heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An application defines a set of quality-of-service (QoS) requirements, described in terms of maximum end-to-end delay, maximum percentage of packet loss, and energy consumption. 11 Moreover, applications require a set of services provided by the physical WSAN nodes that are described in terms of the following provided services: data collection, processing, decision, routing, and actuation. Such capabilities must be published within the cloud in a central repository through a publish/subscribe mechanism.…”
Section: Olympus Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An application defines a set of quality-of-service (QoS) requirements, described in terms of maximum end-to-end delay, maximum percentage of packet loss, and energy consumption. 11 Moreover, applications require a set of services provided by the physical WSAN nodes that are described in terms of the following provided services: data collection, processing, decision, routing, and actuation. Such capabilities must be published within the cloud in a central repository through a publish/subscribe mechanism.…”
Section: Olympus Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UMADE [14] is an integrated system for allocating and deploying applications in shared sensor networks based on the concept of Quality of Monitoring (QoM). Fok et al [15] introduce middleware abstractions to represent multiple QoM requirements from multiple applications, whereas a service-oriented middleware is presented in [16] to address the challenges faced by running multiple applications onto heterogeneous WSNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the computational capacity may be another reason for heterogeneity. For example, the sink node and cluster head nodes have more powerful computational capacity when clustering algorithms are used in the network [20]. However, additional still images, audio and video streams compared with the scalar data make WMSNs kind of stronger heterogeneous networks.…”
Section: B Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%