2014 24th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/fpl.2014.6927465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient 3D triangulation in hardware for dense structure-from-motion in low-speed automotive scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16b shows the corresponding speedup. Finally, although not based on Delaunay, it is worth mentioning the FPGA implementation of a triangulation function in [26], where the authors propose an architecture that employs linear triangulation with an inhomogeneous solution to the equation system. Specifically, [26] involved a comparison between an FPGA implementation and a software counterpart utilizing MATLAB, C++, and OpenCV.…”
Section: Implementation On Fpgamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16b shows the corresponding speedup. Finally, although not based on Delaunay, it is worth mentioning the FPGA implementation of a triangulation function in [26], where the authors propose an architecture that employs linear triangulation with an inhomogeneous solution to the equation system. Specifically, [26] involved a comparison between an FPGA implementation and a software counterpart utilizing MATLAB, C++, and OpenCV.…”
Section: Implementation On Fpgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, although not based on Delaunay, it is worth mentioning the FPGA implementation of a triangulation function in [26], where the authors propose an architecture that employs linear triangulation with an inhomogeneous solution to the equation system. Specifically, [26] involved a comparison between an FPGA implementation and a software counterpart utilizing MATLAB, C++, and OpenCV. Notably, the FPGA implementation was able to process about 572 times more points per second with respect to the C++ software implementation and about 2122 times more than the MATLAB one.…”
Section: Implementation On Fpgamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation