1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(05)80053-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency variation among the Norwegian High Schools: Consequences of equalization policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of inputs and outputs used here is similar to models estimated by Bonesrønning and Rattsø (1994) and Ouellette and Vierstaete (2006). The former study uses graduates as an output and teaching time as a single input, while the latter uses full-time equivalent pupils as the output and teaching and non-teaching staff as inputs along with 3 indexes to reflect physical capital.…”
Section: Data and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of inputs and outputs used here is similar to models estimated by Bonesrønning and Rattsø (1994) and Ouellette and Vierstaete (2006). The former study uses graduates as an output and teaching time as a single input, while the latter uses full-time equivalent pupils as the output and teaching and non-teaching staff as inputs along with 3 indexes to reflect physical capital.…”
Section: Data and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Levin (1974), Bessent and Bessent (1980), Bessent et al (1982), Ludwin and Guthrie, (1989), and Färe et al, (1989) used this method to measure the efficiency of U.S. schools, and Jesson et al, (1987) applied DEA method to study the efficiency of school districts (LEAs) in the UK. Bonesrqnning and Rattsq, (1994) conducted a study of efficiency analysis of Norwegian high schools. SFA was applied by Barrow (1991) to estimate a stochastic cost frontier based on data from schools in England.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the geographical dispersion of the population in these countries, policy makers have accepted that in order to keep sparsely populated areas populated they will have to incur the higher costs associated to keeping quality education in rural and remote areas (Solstad, 2009). In Norway, with the population dispersed in fjords and mountain valleys, about 650,000 people live in peripheral municipalities, where travel time to a larger town or city is more than 45 minutes (Bonesronning and Rattso, 1994;Solstad, 2005). Norway currently displays a very decentralised pattern of schools, in which multi-grade classes are particularly frequent, with more than 35 percent of all primary schools having such an organisation (Bonesronning and Rattso, 1994;Solstad, 2005).…”
Section: Country Approaches To School Size Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Norway, with the population dispersed in fjords and mountain valleys, about 650,000 people live in peripheral municipalities, where travel time to a larger town or city is more than 45 minutes (Bonesronning and Rattso, 1994;Solstad, 2005). Norway currently displays a very decentralised pattern of schools, in which multi-grade classes are particularly frequent, with more than 35 percent of all primary schools having such an organisation (Bonesronning and Rattso, 1994;Solstad, 2005). Despite the compromise to sustain sparsely populated areas, many small schools have experienced increasing pressure from the municipalities (Solstad, 2009).…”
Section: Country Approaches To School Size Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%