2018
DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_40_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of three different polishing methods on enamel and cementum: A scanning electron microscope study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attention is drawn to the microgeometrical characteristics, which, in contrast to the mechanical properties, practically do not change, amounting to 151.3 ± 3 nm. It is well established that some factors can affect the roughness of cementum, such as acidic beverages [47] or polishing techniques applied by the dental clinician [48]. In this regard, the latter observation provides a basis for further ex vivo studies of either cementum alteration under certain conditions or efficacy of dental treatments on recovery of the natural roughness parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention is drawn to the microgeometrical characteristics, which, in contrast to the mechanical properties, practically do not change, amounting to 151.3 ± 3 nm. It is well established that some factors can affect the roughness of cementum, such as acidic beverages [47] or polishing techniques applied by the dental clinician [48]. In this regard, the latter observation provides a basis for further ex vivo studies of either cementum alteration under certain conditions or efficacy of dental treatments on recovery of the natural roughness parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, it has been observed that different methods are used to evaluate the roughness of different applications on dental tissues and restorative materials. When the literature is reviewed, it was seen that there are many studies [15][16][17][18][19] examining the surface roughness with SEM [20][21][22][23] and pro lometer. However, studies with AFM are very few.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have used different types of human teeth in various studies. Chowdary et al [21] conducted a study with 60 teeth in 2018. They included each tooth extracted for periodontal reasons and showed no signs of caries, abrasions or fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yuanli et al ( 2018 ) have noted that different polishing methods have different advantages and disadvantages in terms of four aspects, namely, the plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, and pigment index, and the method should be selected according to patient pigment deposition, gingival bleeding, and plaque deposition. Chowdhary and Mohan ( 2018 ) compared three polishing methods—brush, rubber cup, and air scrub—by dividing 60 periodontitis‐excised teeth from patients with periodontitis into different enamel and cementum samples. It was concluded that rubber cup polishing has a good polishing effect on both gingival and subgingival surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%