2009
DOI: 10.1002/er.1515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of an Otto engine under alternative power optimizations

Abstract: SUMMARYThe proper optimization criterion to be chosen for the optimum design of the heat engines may differ depending on their purposes and working conditions. In this study, a comparative performance analysis is carried out for a reversible Otto cycle based on three alternative performance criteria namely maximum power (mp), maximum power density (mpd) and maximum efficient power (mep). The power density criterion is defined as the power per minimum specific volume in the cycle and the efficient power criteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal r value at maximum P ME can also be found numerically by using Eq. (22). It is obvious from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal r value at maximum P ME can also be found numerically by using Eq. (22). It is obvious from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Gumus et al [22] has performed a comparative performance analysis for a reversible Otto cycle based on three alternative performance criteria namely maximum power (mp), maximum power density (mpd) and maximum efficient power (mep). They defined the power density criterion as the power per minimum specific volume in the cycle and the efficient power criterion as multiplication of the power by the efficiency of the Otto cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main OPBs used in ICE cycles analysis and optimization include power (work) and efficiency [74][75][76], power density [77], effective power [78], EF [79][80][81][82][83][84], ecological coefficient of performance (ECOP) [85] and so on. (2)…”
Section: The Study Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power density defined as the power per minimum specific volume in the cycle then takes the form [17]: In order to write eqs. The power density defined as the power per minimum specific volume in the cycle then takes the form [17]: In order to write eqs.…”
Section: Cycle Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%