2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
80
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, the situation of nuclear power generation has been reconsidered dramatically and studies of clean energy such as solar cells, 1) fuel cells, 2) and an integrated gasification combined cycle 3) have been promoted to an increasing degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the situation of nuclear power generation has been reconsidered dramatically and studies of clean energy such as solar cells, 1) fuel cells, 2) and an integrated gasification combined cycle 3) have been promoted to an increasing degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently studies have shown substantial interest on IGCC technology to employ hydrogen and syngas fuels for the gas turbine combustion [9][10]. This integration of energy conversion processes provides more complete utilization of energy resources, offering high efficiencies and ultra-low pollution levels [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context coal has to be considered as energy source for power generation because of its availability and relatively wide geographic distribution. These developments include coal based electric power technologies, where the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) is an alternative to pulverized coal (PC) combustion systems (Descamps, Bouallou, & Kanniche, 2008;Karg, Haupt, & Zimmermann, 2000;Park et al, 1999;Zheng & Furinsky, 2005), as they obtain higher efficiencies and better environmental performance (Jay, Lynn, Jeff, & Massood, 2002;Minchener, 2005;Ordorica-Garcia, Douglas, Croiset, & Zheng, 2006;Park et al, 1999). In comparison with modern coal combustion technologies (pulverized coal combustion (PCC), fluidized bed combustion (FBC), supercritical and ultra-supercritical technologies), IGCC systems are characterized by lower SO x and NO x emissions, comparable vapor organic carbon (VOC) emissions, 20% less CO 2 emissions and use of 20-40% less water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before CO 2 can be sequestered it must be captured as relatively pure CO 2 from power plants and other sources. In IGCC, as coal is not combusted, the relatively small volumes of synthesis gas (syngas) are easier to clean up than the much larger volumes of flue gases at coal combustion plants (Descamps et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%