2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2013.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of a hybrid solar–gas dryer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most of the recently-proposed methodologies for characterizing the performance of solar dryers (Altobelli et al, 2014;López-Vidaña et al, 2013;Singh and Kumar, 2012), parameters, such as the pick-up efficiency (g p ), the drying efficiency (g d ), the Nomenclature d discount rate (%) LC life-cycle DPBP discounted payback period (years) F v future value of energy FCV future consumption value (J) FPV future production value (J) P v present value of energy (J) NPVEER net present value to embodied energy ratio IRR internal rate of return (%) MARR minimum attractive rate of return (%) MC moisture content (kg kg À1 ) n time into the kiln service life E modulus of elasticity (Pa) NPV net present value (J) Q radiation energy flow rate (W) A surface area (m 2 ) I T total solar radiation (W m À2 ) G cb beam radiation R b ratio of the beam radiation on a tilted surface to that on a horizontal surface (Singh and Kumar, 2012). In Altobelli et al (2014), a model of free water evaporation in a forced solar dryer, where the total solar radiation and the saturation deficit of ambient air were considered as the driving force for drying processes, was described.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the recently-proposed methodologies for characterizing the performance of solar dryers (Altobelli et al, 2014;López-Vidaña et al, 2013;Singh and Kumar, 2012), parameters, such as the pick-up efficiency (g p ), the drying efficiency (g d ), the Nomenclature d discount rate (%) LC life-cycle DPBP discounted payback period (years) F v future value of energy FCV future consumption value (J) FPV future production value (J) P v present value of energy (J) NPVEER net present value to embodied energy ratio IRR internal rate of return (%) MARR minimum attractive rate of return (%) MC moisture content (kg kg À1 ) n time into the kiln service life E modulus of elasticity (Pa) NPV net present value (J) Q radiation energy flow rate (W) A surface area (m 2 ) I T total solar radiation (W m À2 ) G cb beam radiation R b ratio of the beam radiation on a tilted surface to that on a horizontal surface (Singh and Kumar, 2012). In Altobelli et al (2014), a model of free water evaporation in a forced solar dryer, where the total solar radiation and the saturation deficit of ambient air were considered as the driving force for drying processes, was described.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second energy source leads also to extend the drying time and to control the drying parameters during the dehydration process. Various type of hybrid solar-gas dryers [10,11,12] have been designed and developed for fruits, vegetables and other agriculture product drying either at industrial scale or by small farmers. Unfortunately, most of these hybrid dryers burn the gas in the same place with the products where the dried product adsorbs the flue gases as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar Dryers are proper systems to solve the food and energy shortages. Common solar dryers have low drying rates; hence they require a large installation area, making them less attractive to be applied in the industry [27][28][29]. Contrary spouted bed dryers and fluidized bed dryers provide high drying rates, so integrating these technologies to solar collectors, to provide the required energy, results in a high drying rate solar dryer [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%