“…As reforming units, SR, ,,,,– ATR, ,,,,,– POX, ,,,,– and thermal cracking (TC) ,,, have been considered as possible alternative to reformate FFs. On average, SR-based FPs, as compared to the ATR-based ones, showed higher efficiency and larger H 2 concentration, notwithstanding a slightly higher process scheme complexity and a somewhat more difficult water recovery. , In SR-based APU or FP coupled with perm-selective H 2 membranes, the recirculation of reformate from the perm-selective unit to SR enhanced the overall efficiency . As fuels to be reformed, virtually all of the FFs can be considered, starting from gasoline, ,,, diesel, ,,,, biodiesel, ,,, propane, ,,,, and CNG: , on average, considering the commercial liquid FFs and by maintaining the same net power released by the APU, the overall efficiency decreased following the rank gasoline, light, and heavy diesel.…”