2015
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2015.2404918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency Contours and Loss Minimization Over a Driving Cycle of a Variable Flux-Intensifying Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a mismatch of the single operation design method and multiple driving conditions may result in a narrow constant power speed range and low overall efficiency in the entire operation region [9][10][11][12][13]. Thus, the vector control method is introduced to adjust the d-axis current, hence realizing different magnetization states of a variable-flux flux-intensifying interior PM machine to obtain increased efficiency over a driving cycle [14]. However, requirements of precision control are relatively enhanced and the speed range is limited by the inverter capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a mismatch of the single operation design method and multiple driving conditions may result in a narrow constant power speed range and low overall efficiency in the entire operation region [9][10][11][12][13]. Thus, the vector control method is introduced to adjust the d-axis current, hence realizing different magnetization states of a variable-flux flux-intensifying interior PM machine to obtain increased efficiency over a driving cycle [14]. However, requirements of precision control are relatively enhanced and the speed range is limited by the inverter capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CV is initially at a valid steady state operating point within the rated current circle and steady state voltage ellipse. During the [8] first half of the trajectory (denoted by circle 1), the current MS is not equal to the desired MS*, and the only constraint is that the transient voltage required by the trajectory cannot exceed the inverter voltage limit. It is important to note, as was seen in [10], the trajectory may move outside of the steady voltage ellipse when transient voltage components partially cancel steady state voltage components.…”
Section: Process Of Increasing Magnetization State (Ms) In Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These machines can operate with reduced  pm at high speed, which reduces the requirement for flux weakening current [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. [8] showed a 30% reduction in losses over an urban driving cyele by using different levels of  pm .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [18], three families of magnetizing trajectories can be identified, which is used to further extend the speed range, and the high efficiency control over an overall operating range can be achieved with a hysteresis controller for the MS operating algorithm. Besides, a flux-linkage observer based current decoupling method [19]- [20] was used to minimize the torque ripple during the magnetization transients. The MS manipulation can be implemented at zero speed, zero load condition by using voltage disturbance state filter to correct the estimates from a flux observer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%