2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2020.3031304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and Robustness Improvement of Airborne SAR Motion Compensation With High Resolution and Wide Swath

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ue to atmospheric disturbance or pilot error, the actual motion trajectory of an airborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) may easily deviate from a straight line, and the acquired raw data cannot be directly focused due to the existence of motion errors [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Such motion errors can be compensated by measuring the deviations, through the inertial navigation system (INS) and global positioning system (GPS) unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ue to atmospheric disturbance or pilot error, the actual motion trajectory of an airborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) may easily deviate from a straight line, and the acquired raw data cannot be directly focused due to the existence of motion errors [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Such motion errors can be compensated by measuring the deviations, through the inertial navigation system (INS) and global positioning system (GPS) unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the SPE estimation, Ding et al [19] use the resampling weight PGA to estimate the SPEs in the SA Back-Projection imageries. Chen et al [3] combine PGA and the weighted least square method to improve the robustness of PGA. Mao et al [12] propose a knowledge-aided 2-D autofocus method using PGA, in which PGA is employed to estimate the azimuth-frequency phase error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For UAV SAR imaging, a series of autofocus methods based on phase gradient autofocus (PGA) [14] and mapdrift (MD) [15] have been proposed to estimate the residual phase error after conventional MOCO [16]. The advantage of PGA based algorithm is recognized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the imaging quality of SAS is foremost limited by the accurate estimation of platform motions, which requires sub-wavelength knowledge [5][6][7]. This has proven to be challenging in GPS-denied environments, with even high-grade navigation devices potentially not able to achieve sufficient accuracy [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%