1994
DOI: 10.2307/2584392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and Cross-Efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of such methodologies is based on the notion of cross-efficiency -the efficiency indicator calculated for each unit using the optimal weights of other units (Doyle and Green, 1994;Ramón et al, 2011). Another utilises the concept of super-efficiency -a measure of influence of an efficient DMU on the shape of the efficient frontier in its neighbourhood (Andersen and Petersen, 1993).…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of such methodologies is based on the notion of cross-efficiency -the efficiency indicator calculated for each unit using the optimal weights of other units (Doyle and Green, 1994;Ramón et al, 2011). Another utilises the concept of super-efficiency -a measure of influence of an efficient DMU on the shape of the efficient frontier in its neighbourhood (Andersen and Petersen, 1993).…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative efficiency for CRS model may be expressed as follows [33,34]: where E ks is the efficiency of source s, using the weights of ''test'' source k, where the test EP is the unit whose efficiency is to be evaluated; O sy is the value of output y for source s; v ky is the weight assigned to source k for output y; I sx is the value for input x of source s; and u kx is the weight assigned to source k for input x.…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se um modelo é orientado a inputs, significa que as DMUs tentarão atingir a fronteira realizando uma diminuição de seus recursos, sem que seus resultados Uma das formas de aumentar a discriminação entre as DMUs nos modelos DEA é a utilização da fronteira invertida, que é uma avaliação pessimista das DMUs. Sua utilização ocorre devido à simplicidade de utilização, diferentemente de outras técnicas conhecidas em DEA como Cross Evaluation (ou avaliação cruzada) (Doyle e Green, 1994;Sexton et al, 1986) e MCDEA (X.-B. Li e Reeves, 1999), permitindo contornar a tendência de DEA em atribuir vários pesos nulos.…”
Section: Análise Envoltória De Dados Em Processos Licitatóriosunclassified