Abstract:Background:
Collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes (CCH) enzymatically releases fibrous septa that contribute to the skin dimpling characteristic of cellulite. Long-term safety/duration of efficacy (durability) results from an open-label extension (OLE) of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RCT) evaluating CCH efficacy/safety for moderate-to-severe cellulite of the buttocks or posterolateral thighs in women was assessed. Efficacy/safety of CCH treatment/retreatment during OLE … Show more
“…These are credible possibilities acting alone or in concert but our data is unable to distinguish their contributions. Nevertheless, these arguments support the notion that the improved appearance of cellulite arises from the localised treatment, an assertion supported by our previous study [ 8 ] and several other studies [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Cellulite describes unsightly skin overlying subcutaneous fat around thighs and buttocks of post-pubescent females. A herbal ‘emgel’ containing volatile oils and extracts of A traditional Thai herbal compress was tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 18 women aged 20–50 year with severe cellulite. Appearance of cellulite (primary outcome), thigh circumferences, skin firmness, and cutaneous blood flow (secondary outcomes) were assessed at baseline, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks with a 2-week follow-up. Herbal emgel applied onto the thigh skin twice daily reduced cellulite severity scores in every time point. The score was reduced from 13.4 ± 0.3 (baseline) to 12.1 ± 0.3 (week 2) and 9.9 ± 0.6 (week 12). All secondary outcomes improved with both placebo and herbal emgels suggesting that ingredients in the base-formulation might be responsible. Querying of participants, analysis of their diaries, and physical monthly inspections found no adverse events. The herbal emgel safely improved the appearance of cellulite, while the base emgel may play a role for other endpoints. Further studies on the active constituents and their mechanism of action are needed to further explore these factors.
“…These are credible possibilities acting alone or in concert but our data is unable to distinguish their contributions. Nevertheless, these arguments support the notion that the improved appearance of cellulite arises from the localised treatment, an assertion supported by our previous study [ 8 ] and several other studies [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Cellulite describes unsightly skin overlying subcutaneous fat around thighs and buttocks of post-pubescent females. A herbal ‘emgel’ containing volatile oils and extracts of A traditional Thai herbal compress was tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 18 women aged 20–50 year with severe cellulite. Appearance of cellulite (primary outcome), thigh circumferences, skin firmness, and cutaneous blood flow (secondary outcomes) were assessed at baseline, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks with a 2-week follow-up. Herbal emgel applied onto the thigh skin twice daily reduced cellulite severity scores in every time point. The score was reduced from 13.4 ± 0.3 (baseline) to 12.1 ± 0.3 (week 2) and 9.9 ± 0.6 (week 12). All secondary outcomes improved with both placebo and herbal emgels suggesting that ingredients in the base-formulation might be responsible. Querying of participants, analysis of their diaries, and physical monthly inspections found no adverse events. The herbal emgel safely improved the appearance of cellulite, while the base emgel may play a role for other endpoints. Further studies on the active constituents and their mechanism of action are needed to further explore these factors.
“…In an open‐label extension of a previous phase 2 randomized controlled trials, women with moderate‐to‐severe cellulite were subcutaneously administered CCH 0.84 mg in three treatment sessions perpendicular and at 45° angle to the skin in 0.1‐ml aliquots. Improvements were observed to last through 2‐year follow‐up 54,55 …”
Section: Dermal Fillersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Improvements were observed to last through 2-year follow-up. 54,55 Qwo™ (CCH-aaes) is approved by the FDA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe cellulite in the buttocks of adult women. 56…”
Background
Cellulite is a common dermatological condition with a female preponderance, affecting up to 90% post‐pubertal females. It is characterized with dimpling and denting of the skin surface, giving it a Peau d'orange appearance. Once considered to be a benign physiological isolated skin condition of only an esthetic concern, cellulite is now considered a pathological entity with systemic associations and a negative psychological impact on patients.
Aims
The objective of this article was to discuss etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of cellulite.
Materials and methods
Literature was screened to retrieve articles from PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar and related websites. Cross‐references from the relevant articles were also considered for review. Review articles, clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta‐analysis, and relevant information from selected websites were included.
Results
Several treatment options from lifestyle modifications and topical cosmetic therapies to energy‐based devices have been studied for its treatment. However, treatment remains a challenge despite many new modalities in the armamentarium. Laser and light therapies along with radiofrequency are useful treatment options with good safety profile. Acoustic wave therapy, subcision, and 1440‐nm Nd:YAG minimally invasive laser are beneficial in cellulite reduction.
Discussion
Methodological differences in the trials conducted make it difficult to compare different treatment modalities.
Conclusion
Overall, treatment needs to be individualized based on the patient characteristics and severity of the condition. A combination of treatments is often required in most patients for reducing cellulite.
“…Collagenase clostridium histolyticum‐aaes (CCH‐aaes; Qwo ® ) is indicated in the United States for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe cellulite in the buttocks of adult women, 1 with demonstrated efficacy and safety in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. 2 , 3 , 4 CCH‐aaes treatment for thigh cellulite is currently investigational. The mechanism of action of CCH‐aaes is attributed to Enzymatic Subcision and Remodeling™ (ESR™).…”
Background
Given differences in buttock versus thigh cellulite, collagenase clostridium histolyticum‐aaes (CCH‐aaes) injection technique may impact treatment effects at these sites.
Aim
To evaluate efficacy and safety of 5 CCH‐aaes injection techniques.
Methods
A phase 2A, open‐label trial enrolled women with mild‐to‐severe cellulite (Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale) on both buttocks or thighs. CCH‐aaes 0.84 mg was administered as 12 injections in each of two buttock or two thigh treatment areas (total dose, 1.68 mg) during three treatment sessions (Days 1, 22, 43). On Day 1, women were sequentially assigned to: Technique A = shallow injection/3 aliquots; Technique B = shallow injection/1 aliquot; Technique C = deep injection/1 aliquot; Technique D = deep and shallow injections/5 aliquots; or Technique E = shallow injection/4 aliquots. Change from baseline in Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) depression depth (range, 0 [no depressions] to 3 [deep depressions]) was assessed at Day 71. Safety was evaluated via adverse events.
Results
Sixty‐three women with buttock (n = 31) or thigh (n = 32) cellulite received ≥1 CCH‐aaes dose. For buttock cellulite, CCH‐aaes injection Technique A resulted in the greatest baseline‐adjusted improvement in CSS score on Day 71 (least‐squares mean, 1.17‐point improvement). For thigh cellulite, CSS score improvement was greatest with Technique D (least‐squares mean, 1.40‐point improvement). CCH injection Techniques A, D, and E were associated with more favorable safety profiles than Techniques B and C.
Conclusion
Different CCH‐aaes injection techniques are required with buttock (Technique A) versus thigh (Technique D) cellulite to optimize treatment outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.