2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1096-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of TiF4 and NaF varnish and solution: a randomized in situ study on enamel erosive–abrasive wear

Abstract: In vitro studies have indicated a better anti-erosive/abrasive effect of TiF4 compared to NaF varnish. The present in situ study does not support the previous findings. Therefore, any of the tested professional fluoride varnishes in principle could be able to partially reduce enamel wear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
19

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…8,12,14 The antierosive effect of experimental TiF 4 varnish is mainly compared to that of the conventional NaF varnish, and studies have prompted speculations about the thickness and properties of protective layers formed by NaF and TiF 4 varnishes. 12,13,14,15 Levy et al 12 speculated that the CaF 2 layer is less resistant to erosion compared with metal-rich surface precipitates. Comar et al 15 speculated that the glaze-like surface layer produced by TiF 4 might be too thin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,12,14 The antierosive effect of experimental TiF 4 varnish is mainly compared to that of the conventional NaF varnish, and studies have prompted speculations about the thickness and properties of protective layers formed by NaF and TiF 4 varnishes. 12,13,14,15 Levy et al 12 speculated that the CaF 2 layer is less resistant to erosion compared with metal-rich surface precipitates. Comar et al 15 speculated that the glaze-like surface layer produced by TiF 4 might be too thin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The antierosive effect of TiF 4 varnish compared to conventional varnishes, such as sodium fluoride (NaF), is still contradictory. 11,12,13,14 In order to explain these contradictory results, recent speculations have been made about the deposition and thickness of the layer formed by TiF 4 varnish application, 4,15 but there is a paucity of data on the thickness and properties of the protective layer formed by TiF 4 varnish after an erosive challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 It is very difficult to control the possible multifactorial etiology of noncarious lesions. Therefore, strategies have been developed to prevent or stop the dental erosion and abrasion, with the use of different forms of fluoride agents, 4 calcium-containing products, 5 and surface agents, such as proteins and polymers. 6,7 However, the data are conflicting regarding effective protection against erosion and abrasion.…”
Section: 5005/jp-journals-10024-2140mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, TiF 4 action has been widely studied 19,[28][29][30] in Dentistry. In the form of TiF 4 , this fluoride presents satisfactory stability and particular mechanism of action in relation to the other fluorides.…”
Section: Titanium Tetrafluoridementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since TiF 4 enables the formation of this acid-resistant layer, it is responsible for the production of a diffusion barrier and a reservoir of F ions, which may delay the dissolution of dental tissue exposed to acidic challenges 25 . For this reason, its effect on erosion has been studied and has obtained promising results in both enamel 19,20,30,39,42 and dentin 43 . These results are dependent on the concentration, form of presentation, pH and time of application of TiF 4 26,30,39 .…”
Section: Titanium Tetrafluoridementioning
confidence: 99%