2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-003-1258-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of surveillance and molecular markers for detection of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to several studies that have assessed the efficacy of surveillance, an appreciable number of neoplasia were detected at an advanced stage despite surveillance colonoscopy, and many of these cases had less-than-ideal outcomes [6][7][8] . Thus, it still remains questionable whether surveillance colonoscopy with multiple-step biopsy effectively enables early detection of UC-associated neoplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, according to several studies that have assessed the efficacy of surveillance, an appreciable number of neoplasia were detected at an advanced stage despite surveillance colonoscopy, and many of these cases had less-than-ideal outcomes [6][7][8] . Thus, it still remains questionable whether surveillance colonoscopy with multiple-step biopsy effectively enables early detection of UC-associated neoplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because UC-associated neoplasia is often difficult to detect endoscopically and to discriminate from inflammatory regenerative epithelium histologically, it remains a matter of contention whether conventional surveillance colonoscopy is effective for early detection [6][7][8] . In order to improve the efficacy of surveillance, there is an urgent need for sensitive and specific markers to identify individuals at increased risk of neoplasia among patients with long-standing and extensive UC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also reviewed Japanese case reports of UC-associated neoplasia published between 1990 and 2002 [15]. Of 118 patients with UC-associated neoplasia, 41 underwent surveillance colonoscopy (surveillance group), 64 did not (nonsurveillance group), and the remaining 13 cases were unknown as to surveillance status.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Surveillance For Uc-associated Colorectal Neoplasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, possibly because the number of UC patients with dysplasia/neoplasia is smaller than that in Western countries. We reviewed Japanese case reports of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia published between 1990 and 2002 (Fujii et al, 2003b). Of 118 patients with UC-associated neoplasia, 41 underwent surveillance colonoscopy (surveillance group), 64 did not (nonsurveillance group), and the remaining 13 cases were unknown as to surveillance status.…”
Section: Risk Factor and Clinicopathological Characteristics Of Dysplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveillance (41) Nonsurveillance (64 Fujii et al, 2003b) Regarding depth of tumor invasion, early colorectal cancer, defined as tumor invading the lamina propria and/or muscularis mucosae and/or submucosa, was more frequent in the surveillance group than in the nonsurveillance group (60.5% vs. 27.6%). The incidence of lymph node metastasis was lower in the surveillance group than in the nonsurveillance group (13.8% vs. 52.1%).…”
Section: Risk Factor and Clinicopathological Characteristics Of Dysplmentioning
confidence: 99%