Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving lower limb function in individuals with neurological disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation vs sham stimulation on improving lower-limb functional outcomes in individuals with neurological disorders. 
 Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Scopus databases were searched from inception to 31 March 2020 to identify papers (n = 1,198). Two researchers independently reviewed studies for eligibility. Randomized clinical trials with parallel-group design, involving individuals with neurological disorders, including lower-limb functional outcome measures and published in scientific peer-reviewed journals were included. 
 Data extraction: Two researchers independently screened eligible papers (n = 27) for study design, clinical population characteristics, stimulation protocol and relevant outcome measures, and assessed study quality.
 Data synthesis: Studies presented a moderate risk of selection, attrition and reporting bias. An overall effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was found for outcomes: gait (effect size [95% confidence interval; 95% CI]: 0.51 [0.29; 0.74], p = 0.003) and muscle strength (0.99 [0.40; 1.58], p = 0.001) and disorders: stroke (0.20 [0.00; 0.39], p = 0.05), Parkinson’s disease (1.01 [0.65; 1.37], p = 0.02) and spinal cord injury (0.50 [0.14; 0.85], p = 0.006), compared with sham. No effect was found for outcomes: mobility and balance.
 Conclusion: Supplementary repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may promote rehabilitation focused on ambulation and muscle strength and overall lower-limb functional recovery in individuals with stroke, Parkinson’s disease and spinal cord injury. Further evidence is needed to extrapolate these findings. a

Intermittent theta-burst stimulation with physical exercise improves poststroke motor function: A systemic review and meta-analysis

“…Besides, new rehabilitation treatments such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), virtual reality (VR), and rehabilitation robots have been gradually applied in the clinic ( 3 ). Among them, NIBS has been proven to affect stroke sequelae in many studies ( 4 – 6 ).…”

Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on walking and balance ability in Parkinson’s patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…According to our analysis, two factors may have caused the above results. First, we consider that the diversity of the stimulation protocols utilized in each study was the cause (Lee et al, 2019;Nardone et al, 2020;de Oliveira et al, 2021;Nascimento et al, 2021;Pol et al, 2021;Deng et al, 2022;Krogh et al, 2022). Although our results did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between NIBS and gait speed, balance, or stride length, this does not mean that NIBS does not affect these outcomes.…”

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic Option for Neurologic Diseases and Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review

“…Furthermore, many theories indicate that activating the contralateral hemisphere via HF stimulation fosters brain function re-organization and facilitates compensatory capacity in individuals with neuropsychiatric conditions. Such has been stated by Krogh et al [16], as both Parkinson's patients and multiple sclerosis patients benefited from active rTMS sessions over contralateral to the affected side. The authors demonstrated TMS's potential in improving patients with stroke by enhancing their day-to-day activities and upper limb movement.…”